Towards Tangible Algorithms: Exploring the Experiences of Tangible Interactions with Movie Recommender Algorithms
Oscar Alvarado, Vero Vanden Abeele, David Geerts, Katrien Verbert
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) supports many of our everyday activities and decisions. However, personalized algorithmic recommendations often produce adverse experiences due to a lack of awareness, control, or transparency. While research has directed solutions on graphical user interfaces (GUIs), there are no explorations of Tangible User Interfaces (TUIs) to improve the experience with such systems, despite the valid existing academic arguments in favor of this exploration. Therefore, centering on transparency and control, we analyzed how 18 users of movie recommender systems perceived four different TUIs using individual co-design sessions and post-interview questionnaires. Through thematic analysis, we identified seven design considerations while designing TUIs to interact with algorithmic movie recommender systems: (1) Distinctions between TUIs and GUIs; (2) TUIs replacing predominant interfaces; (3) Preference for single-device TUIs; (4) The relevance of granular control for TUIs; (5) Apparent transparency limitations of TUIs; (6) TUIs and algorithmic social computing; and (7) Overview of specific design choices, including advantages and disadvantages of soft, hard, rounded, cubic, and humanoid interfaces. These findings inspired Recffy: the first functional TUI designed to enhance awareness and control in personalized movie recommendations. Based on this study, we propose the concept of Tangible Algorithms: TUIs dedicated to enhancing the interaction of algorithmic systems and their profiling processes or decisions in a specific context. Furthermore, we describe the relevance of tangible algorithms and design guidelines to promote them in diverse AI contexts. Finally, we invite the HCI and CSCW community to continue exploring tangible algorithms to address the interaction with algorithmic systems, including the collaborative and social computing dynamics they can promote in diverse AI contexts.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itRelated papers
- Rethinking User Empowerment in AI Recommender System: Innovating Transparent and Controllable InterfacesMengke Wu, Weizi Liu, Yanyun Wang, Weiyu Ding et al.CHI 2026 · 3 citations
- 'Transparency is Meant for Control' and Vice Versa: Learning from Co-designing and Evaluating Algorithmic News RecommendersElias Storms, Oscar Alvarado, Luciana Monteiro KrebsCSCW 2022 · 29 citations
- A Systematic Review of Interaction Design Strategies for Group Recommendation SystemsOscar Alvarado, Nyi Nyi Htun, Yucheng Jin, Katrien VerbertCSCW 2022 · 21 citations
- Memory Printer: Exploring Everyday Reminiscing by Combining Slow Design with Generative AI-based Image CreationZhou Fang, Janet Yi-Ching HuangCHI 2026
- Exploring Users' Perspectives on a Solid-Enabled Personal Data Store Enhanced Streaming ServiceTim Theys, Stephanie Van Hove, Peter Mechant, Gill Van Impe et al.CHI 2025 · 2 citations
