Measuring Human Contribution in AI-Assisted Content Generation
Yueqi Xie, Tao Qi, Jingwei Yi, Xiyuan Yang, Ryan Whalen, Junming Huang, Qian Ding, Yu Xie, Xing Xie, Fangzhao Wu
Abstract
With the growing prevalence of generative AI, an increasing amount of content is no longer exclusively generated by humans but by generative AI models with human guidance. This shift presents notable challenges for the delineation of originality due to the varying degrees of human contribution in AI-assisted works. This study raises the research question of measuring human contribution in AI-assisted content generation and introduces a framework to address this question that is grounded in information theory. By calculating mutual information between human input and AI-assisted output relative to self-information of AI-assisted output, we quantify the proportional information contribution of humans in content generation. Our experimental results demonstrate that the proposed measure effectively discriminates between varying degrees of human contribution across multiple creative domains. To further enhance real-world applicability, we extend the framework to estimate the minimal necessary human contribution for any text without requiring human input and validate its effectiveness. We hope that this work lays a foundation for measuring human contributions in AI-assisted content generation in the era of generative AI.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on8
- Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human PreferenceWei-Lin Chiang, Lianmin Zheng, Ying Sheng, Anastasios Nikolas Angelopoulos et al.ICML 2024 · 1,212 citations
- DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability CurvatureEric Mitchell, Yoonho Lee, Alexander Khazatsky, Christopher D. Manning et al.ICML 2023 · 988 citations
- A Watermark for Large Language ModelsJohn Kirchenbauer, Jonas Geiping, Yuxin Wen, Jonathan Katz et al.ICML 2023 · 854 citations
- WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the WildWenting Zhao, Xiang Ren, Jack Hessel, Claire Cardie et al.ICLR 2024 · 504 citations
- Provable Robust Watermarking for AI-Generated TextXuandong Zhao, Prabhanjan Vijendra Ananth, Lei Li, Yu-Xiang WangICLR 2024 · 312 citations
Related papers
- Which Contributions Deserve Credit? Perceptions of Attribution in Human-AI Co-CreationJessica He, Stephanie Houde, Justin D. WeiszCHI 2025 · 70 citations
- How Does the Disclosure of AI Assistance Affect the Perceptions of Writing?Zhuoyan Li, Chen Liang, Jing Peng, Ming YinEMNLP 2024 · 8 citations
- The Effects of Perceived AI Use On Content PerceptionsIrene RaeCHI 2024 · 38 citations
- How the Role of Generative AI Shapes Perceptions of Value in Human-AI Collaborative WorkAaron Schecter, Benjamin RichardsonCHI 2025 · 6 citations
- Human vs. Generative AI in Content Creation Competition: Symbiosis or Conflict?Fan Yao, Chuanhao Li, Denis Nekipelov, Hongning Wang et al.ICML 2024 · 31 citations
