Digital Healthcare-Associated Infection: A Case Study on the Security of a Major Multi-Campus Hospital System
Luis Vargas, Logan Blue, Vanessa Frost, Christopher Patton, Nolen Scaife, Kevin R. B. Butler, Patrick Traynor
Abstract
Modern hospital systems are complex environments that rely on high interconnectivity with the larger Internet. With this connectivity comes a vast attack surface. Security researchers have expended considerable effort to characterize the risks posed to medical devices (e.g., pacemakers and insulin pumps). However, there has been no systematic, ecosystem-wide analyses of a modern hospital system to date, perhaps due to the challenges of collecting and analyzing sensitive healthcare data. Hospital traffic requires special considerations because healthcare data may contain private information or may come from safety-critical devices in charge of patient care. We describe the process of obtaining the network data in a safe and ethical manner in order to help expand future research in this field. We present an analysis of network-enabled devices connected to the hospital used for its daily operations without posing any harm to the hospital's environment. We perform a Digital Healthcare-Associated Infection (D-HAI) analysis of the hospital ecosystem, assessing a major multi-campus healthcare system over a period of six months. As part of the D-HAI analysis, we characterize DNS requests and TLS/SSL communications to better understand the threats faced within the hospital environment without disturbing the operational network. Contrary to past assumptions, we find that medical devices have minimal exposure to the external Internet, but that medical support devices (e.g., servers, computer terminals) essential for daily hospital operations are much more exposed. While much of this communication appears to be benign, we discover evidence of insecure and broken cryptography and misconfigured devices, and potential botnet activity. Analyzing the network ecosystem in which they operate gives us an insight into the weaknesses and misconfigurations hospitals need to address to ensure the safety and privacy of patients.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 820c6530-e78c-46fa-bfbd-e0ab4212c532Cited by top-tier papers2
- Patching Up: Stakeholder Experiences of Security Updates for Connected Medical DevicesLorenz Kustosch, Carlos Gañán, Michel van Eeten, Simon ParkinUSENIX Security 2025
- Detecting IMSI-Catchers by Characterizing Identity Exposing Messages in Cellular TrafficTyler Tucker, Nathaniel Bennett, Martin Kotuliak, Simon Erni et al.NDSS 2025
Builds on2
Related papers
- Detecting Sources of Healthcare Associated InfectionsHankyu Jang, Andrew Fu, Jiaming Cui, Methun Kamruzzaman et al.AAAI 2023 · 6 citations
- Understanding the Mirai BotnetManos Antonakakis, Tim April, Michael D. Bailey, Matt Bernhard et al.USENIX Security 2017 · 2,003 citations
- Measurement and Analysis of Hajime, a Peer-to-peer IoT BotnetStephen Herwig, Katura Harvey, George Hughey, Richard Roberts et al.NDSS 2019 · 168 citations
- "Your imaging may be stone-cold normal, but if they look sick, they’re going to get admitted": An Investigation of Clinicians’ Perceptions of Impact & Likelihood of Security FailuresRonald E. Thompson III, Hamza Khalid, Hilary Fisher, Rhea Votipka et al.USENIX Security 2026
- Contact Tracing for Healthcare Workers in an Intensive Care UnitJingwen Zhang, Ruixuan Dai, Ashraf Rjob, Ruiqi Wang et al.UbiComp 2023 · 6 citations
