Jacobian Sparse Autoencoders: Sparsify Computations, Not Just Activations
Lucy Farnik, Tim Lawson, Conor J. Houghton, Laurence Aitchison
Abstract
Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) have been successfully used to discover sparse and humaninterpretable representations of the latent activations of LLMs. However, we would ultimately like to understand the computations performed by LLMs and not just their representations. The extent to which SAEs can help us understand computations is unclear because they are not designed to "sparsify" computations in any sense, only latent activations. To solve this, we propose Jacobian SAEs (JSAEs), which yield not only sparsity in the input and output activations of a given model component but also sparsity in the computation (formally, the Jacobian) connecting them. With a naïve implementation, the Jacobians in LLMs would be computationally intractable due to their size. One key technical contribution is thus finding an efficient way of computing Jacobians in this setup. We find that JSAEs extract a relatively large degree of computational sparsity while preserving downstream LLM performance approximately as well as traditional SAEs. We also show that Jacobians are a reasonable proxy for computational sparsity because MLPs are approximately linear when rewritten in the JSAE basis. Lastly, we show that JSAEs achieve a greater degree of computational sparsity on pre-trained LLMs than on the equivalent randomized LLM. This shows that the sparsity of the computational graph appears to be a property that LLMs learn through training, and suggests that JSAEs might be more suitable for understanding learned transformer computations than standard SAEs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers8
- Automated Interpretability Metrics Do Not Distinguish Trained and Random TransformersThomas Heap, Tim Lawson, Lucy Farnik, Laurence AitchisonICLR 2026 · 32 citations
- Small Transformers Don’t Need LayerNorm at Inference Time: Scaling LayerNorm Removal to GPT-2 XL and Implications for Mechanistic InterpretabilityLuca Baroni, Galvin Khara, Joachim Schaeffer, Marat Subkhankulov et al.ICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- Towards Interpretability Without Sacrifice: Faithful Dense Layer Decomposition with Mixture of DecodersJames Oldfield, Shawn Im, Sharon Li, Mihalis A. Nicolaou et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
- Interpreting vision transformers via residual replacement modelJinyeong Kim, Junhyeok Kim, Yumin Shim, Joohyeok Kim et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- Interpretation Meets Safety: A Survey on Interpretation Methods and Tools for Improving LLM SafetySeongmin Lee, Aeree Cho, Grace C. Kim, Shengyun Peng et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on15
- Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTKevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, Yonatan BelinkovNeurIPS 2022 · 3,415 citations
- Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language ModelsRobert Huben, Hoagy Cunningham, Logan Riggs Smith, Aidan Ewart et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,072 citations
- Towards Automated Circuit Discovery for Mechanistic InterpretabilityArthur Conmy, Augustine N. Mavor-Parker, Aengus Lynch, Stefan Heimersheim et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 861 citations
- How does GPT-2 compute greater-than?: Interpreting mathematical abilities in a pre-trained language modelMichael Hanna, Ollie Liu, Alexandre VariengienNeurIPS 2023 · 251 citations
- Towards Best Practices of Activation Patching in Language Models: Metrics and MethodsFred Zhang, Neel NandaICLR 2024 · 233 citations
Related papers
- Sparse but Wrong: Incorrect L0 Leads to Incorrect Features in Sparse AutoencodersDavid Chanin, Adrià Garriga-AlonsoICML 2026 · 8 citations
- Residual Stream Analysis with Multi-Layer SAEsTim Lawson, Lucy Farnik, Conor J. Houghton, Laurence AitchisonICLR 2025
- Sparse Autoencoders Trained on the Same Data Learn Different FeaturesGonçalo Paulo, Nora BelroseICLR 2026 · 96 citations
- A is for Absorption: Studying Feature Splitting and Absorption in Sparse AutoencodersDavid Chanin, James Wilken-Smith, Tomás Dulka, Hardik Bhatnagar et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 168 citations
- Sparse Autoencoders Do Not Find Canonical Units of AnalysisPatrick Leask, Bart Bussmann, Michael T. Pearce, Joseph Isaac Bloom et al.ICLR 2025
