Transition Models: Rethinking the Generative Learning Objective
Zidong Wang, Yiyuan Zhang, Xiaoyu Yue, Xiangyu Yue, Yangguang Li, Wanli Ouyang, Lei Bai
Abstract
A fundamental dilemma in generative modeling persists: iterative diffusion models achieve outstanding fidelity, but at a significant computational cost, while efficient few-step alternatives are constrained by a hard quality ceiling. This conflict between generation steps and output quality arises from restrictive training objectives that focus exclusively on either infinitesimal dynamics (PF-ODEs) or direct endpoint prediction. We address this challenge by introducing an exact, continuous-time dynamics equation that analytically defines state transitions across any finite time interval ∆t. This leads to a novel generative paradigm, Transition Models (TiM), which adapt to arbitrary-step transitions, seamlessly traversing the generative trajectory from single leaps to fine-grained refinement with more steps. Despite having only 865M parameters, TiM achieves state-of-the-art performance, surpassing leading models such as SD3.5 (8B parameters) and FLUX.1 (12B parameters) across all evaluated step counts. Importantly, unlike previous few-step generators, TiM demonstrates monotonic quality improvement as the sampling budget increases. Additionally, when employing our native-resolution strategy, TiM delivers exceptional fidelity at resolutions up to 4096 × 4096.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 81c7b23c-b714-4c7a-a11d-4d97b3e705bbCited by top-tier papers18
- Improved Mean Flows: On the Challenges of Fastforward Generative ModelsZhengyang Geng, Yiyang Lu, Zongze Wu, Eli Shechtman et al.CVPR 2026 · 116 citations
- AlphaFlow: Understanding and Improving MeanFlow ModelsHuijie Zhang, Aliaksandr Siarohin, Willi Menapace, Michael Vasilkovsky et al.ICLR 2026 · 44 citations
- Transition Matching Distillation for Fast Video GenerationWeili Nie, Julius Berner, Nanye Ma, Chao Liu et al.CVPR 2026 · 24 citations
- SoFlow: Solution Flow Models for One-Step Generative ModelingTianze Luo, Haotian Yuan, Zhuang LiuICLR 2026 · 18 citations
- TwinFlow: Realizing One-step Generation on Large Models with Self-adversarial FlowsZhenglin Cheng, Peng Sun, Jianguo Li, Tao LinICLR 2026 · 17 citations
Builds on46
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image SynthesisPrafulla Dhariwal, Alexander Quinn NicholNeurIPS 2021 · 13,211 citations
- High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion ModelsRobin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser et al.CVPR 2022 · 13,123 citations
- Directly Denoising Diffusion ModelsDan Zhang, Jingjing Wang, Feng LuoICML 2024 · 11,724 citations
- Scalable Diffusion Models with TransformersWilliam Peebles, Saining XieICCV 2023 · 5,568 citations
Related papers
- Progressive Distillation for Fast Sampling of Diffusion ModelsTim Salimans, Jonathan HoICLR 2022 · 9 citations
- Consistency Trajectory Models: Learning Probability Flow ODE Trajectory of DiffusionDongjun Kim, Chieh-Hsin Lai, Wei-Hsiang Liao, Naoki Murata et al.ICLR 2024 · 377 citations
- Simplifying, Stabilizing and Scaling Continuous-time Consistency ModelsCheng Lu, Yang SongICLR 2025
- Align Your Flow: Scaling Continuous-Time Flow Map DistillationAmirmojtaba Sabour, Sanja Fidler, Karsten KreisNeurIPS 2025 · 91 citations
- Transition Matching: Scalable and Flexible Generative ModelingNeta Shaul, Uriel Singer, Itai Gat, Yaron LipmanNeurIPS 2025 · 10 citations
