MoRI: Learning Motivation-Grounded Reasoning for Scientific Ideation in Large Language Models
Chenyang Gu, Jiahao Cheng, Meicong Zhang, Pujun Zheng, Jinquan Zheng, Guoxiu He
Abstract
Scientific ideation aims to propose novel solutions within a given scientific context. Existing LLM-based agentic approaches emulate human research workflows, yet inadequately model scientific reasoning, resulting in surface-level conceptual recombinations that lack technical depth and scientific grounding. To address this issue, we propose MoRI (Motivation-grounded Reasoning for Scientific Ideation), a framework that enables LLMs to explicitly learn the reasoning process from research motivations to methodologies. The base LLM is initialized via supervised fine-tuning to generate a research motivation from a given context, and is subsequently trained under a composite reinforcement learning reward that approximates scientific rigor: (1) entropy-aware information gain encourages the model to uncover and elaborate high-complexity technical details grounded in ground-truth methodologies, and (2) contrastive semantic gain constrains the reasoning trajectory to remain conceptually aligned with scientifically valid solutions. Empirical results show that MoRI consistently outperforms strong commercial LLMs and complex agentic baselines across multiple dimensions, including novelty, technical rigor, and feasibility. The code is available on GitHub.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 81b0886e-2e7b-4c23-a6fd-efc7f94b7600Builds on15
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- ReTool: Reinforcement Learning for Strategic Tool Use in LLMsJiazhan Feng, Shijue Huang, Xingwei Qu, Ge Zhang et al.ICLR 2026 · 406 citations
- Rubrics as Rewards: Reinforcement Learning Beyond Verifiable DomainsAnisha Gunjal, Anthony Wang, Elaine Lau, Vaskar Nath et al.ICLR 2026 · 340 citations
- AutoSurvey: Large Language Models Can Automatically Write SurveysYidong Wang, Qi Guo, Wenjin Yao, Hongbo Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 151 citations
- AI-Researcher: Autonomous Scientific InnovationJiabin Tang, Lianghao Xia, Zhonghang Li, Chao HuangNeurIPS 2025 · 101 citations
Related papers
- Can LLMs Generate Novel Research Ideas? A Large-Scale Human Study with 100+ NLP ResearchersChenglei Si, Diyi Yang, Tatsunori HashimotoICLR 2025
- AMOR: A Recipe for Building Adaptable Modular Knowledge Agents Through Process FeedbackJian Guan, Wei Wu, Zujie Wen, Peng Xu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 35 citations
- Towards Execution-Grounded Automated AI ResearchChenglei Si, Zitong Yang, Yejin Choi, Emmanuel J Candes et al.ICML 2026 · 12 citations
- SciMON: Scientific Inspiration Machines Optimized for NoveltyQingyun Wang, Doug Downey, Heng Ji, Tom HopeACL 2024 · 22 citations
- Dolphin: Moving Towards Closed-loop Auto-research through Thinking, Practice, and FeedbackJiakang Yuan, Xiangchao Yan, Bo Zhang, Tao Chen et al.ACL 2025 · 8 citations
