Transitional Uncertainty with Layered Intermediate Predictions
Ryan Benkert, Mohit Prabhushankar, Ghassan AlRegib
Abstract
In this paper, we discuss feature engineering for single-pass uncertainty estimation. For accurate uncertainty estimates, neural networks must extract differences in the feature space that quantify uncertainty. This could be achieved by current single-pass approaches that maintain feature distances between data points as they traverse the network. While initial results are promising, maintaining feature distances within the network representations frequently inhibits information compression and opposes the learning objective. We study this effect theoretically and empirically to arrive at a simple conclusion: preserving feature distances in the output is beneficial when the preserved features contribute to learning the label distribution and act in opposition otherwise. We then propose Transitional Uncertainty with Layered Intermediate Predictions (TULIP) as a simple approach to address the shortcomings of current single-pass estimators. Specifically, we implement feature preservation by extracting features from intermediate representations before information is collapsed by subsequent layers. We refer to the underlying preservation mechanism as transitional feature preservation. We show that TULIP matches or outperforms current single-pass methods on standard benchmarks and in practical settings where these methods are less reliable (imbalances, complex architectures, medical modalities).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 817fd854-842b-41a9-9faf-845cdccbc6aeCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on12
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Energy-based Out-of-distribution DetectionWeitang Liu, Xiaoyun Wang, John D. Owens, Yixuan LiNeurIPS 2020 · 2,213 citations
- Simple and Principled Uncertainty Estimation with Deterministic Deep Learning via Distance AwarenessJeremiah Z. Liu, Zi Lin, Shreyas Padhy, Dustin Tran et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 604 citations
- BatchEnsemble: an Alternative Approach to Efficient Ensemble and Lifelong LearningYeming Wen, Dustin Tran, Jimmy BaICLR 2020 · 569 citations
- Uncertainty Estimation Using a Single Deep Deterministic Neural NetworkJoost van Amersfoort, Lewis Smith, Yee Whye Teh, Yarin GalICML 2020 · 529 citations
Related papers
- Distance-informed Neural ProcessesAishwarya Venkataramanan, Joachim DenzlerNeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- Deep Deterministic Uncertainty: A New Simple BaselineJishnu Mukhoti, Andreas Kirsch, Joost van Amersfoort, Philip H. S. Torr et al.CVPR 2023
- A Rate-Distortion View of Uncertainty QuantificationIfigeneia Apostolopoulou, Benjamin Eysenbach, Frank Nielsen, Artur DubrawskiICML 2024 · 3 citations
- Ensemble Distribution DistillationAndrey Malinin, Bruno Mlodozeniec, Mark J. F. GalesICLR 2020 · 273 citations
- Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification for Pretrained Neural NetworksHanjing Wang, Qiang JiCVPR 2024 · 5 citations
