Neuro-Symbolic Temporal Point Processes
Yang Yang, Chao Yang, Boyang Li, Yinghao Fu, Shuang Li
Abstract
Our goal is to discover a compact set of temporal logic rules to explain irregular events of interest. We introduce a neural-symbolic rule induction framework within the temporal point process model. The negative log-likelihood is the loss that guides the learning, where the explanatory logic rules and their weights are learned end-to-end in a way. Specifically, predicates and logic rules are represented as , where the predicate embeddings are fixed and the rule embeddings are trained via gradient descent to obtain the most appropriate compositional representations of the predicate embeddings. To make the rule learning process more efficient and flexible, we adopt a , which progressively adds rules to the model and removes the event sequences that have been explained until all event sequences have been covered. All the found rules will be fed back to the models for a final rule embedding and weight refinement. Our approach showcases notable efficiency and accuracy across synthetic and real datasets, surpassing state-of-the-art baselines by a wide margin in terms of efficiency.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers4
- Inferring the Invisible: Neuro-Symbolic Rule Discovery for Missing Value ImputationWendi Ren, Ke Wan, Junyu Leng, Shuang LiICLR 2026
- Forward-Chaining Temporal Point ProcessChao Yang, Wendi Ren, Shuang LiICML 2026
- Evolving Minds: Logic-Informed Inference from Temporal Action PatternsChao Yang, Shuting Cui, Yang Yang, Shuang LiICML 2025
- Conformal Anomaly Detection in Event SequencesShuai Zhang, Chuan Zhou, Yang Liu, Peng Zhang et al.ICML 2025
Builds on6
- Transformer Hawkes ProcessSimiao Zuo, Haoming Jiang, Zichong Li, Tuo Zhao et al.ICML 2020 · 382 citations
- Self-Attentive Hawkes ProcessQiang Zhang, Aldo Lipani, Ömer Kirnap, Emine YilmazICML 2020 · 254 citations
- Learning Neural Point Processes with Latent GraphsQiang Zhang, Aldo Lipani, Emine YilmazWWW 2021 · 30 citations
- Temporal Logic Point ProcessesShuang Li, Lu Wang, Ruizhi Zhang, Xiaofu Chang et al.ICML 2020 · 22 citations
- Explaining Point Processes by Learning Interpretable Temporal Logic RulesShuang Li, Mingquan Feng, Lu Wang, Abdelmajid Essofi et al.ICLR 2022 · 21 citations
Related papers
- Weighted Clock Logic Point ProcessRuixuan Yan, Yunshi Wen, Debarun Bhattacharjya, Ronny Luss et al.ICLR 2023
- Learning Reliable and Intuitive Temporal Logic Rules for Interpretable Time Series ClassificationYang Wang, Jiaqi Zhu, Miaomiao Li, Jiang Liu et al.KDD 2025
- Learn to Explain Efficiently via Neural Logic Inductive LearningYuan Yang, Le SongICLR 2020 · 83 citations
- Neuro-Symbolic Hierarchical Rule InductionClaire Glanois, Zhaohui Jiang, Xuening Feng, Paul Weng et al.ICML 2022 · 34 citations
- Differentiable Neuro-Symbolic Reasoning on Large-Scale Knowledge GraphsShengyuan Chen, Yunfeng Cai, Huang Fang, Xiao Huang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 56 citations
