Topology of Reasoning: Retrieved Cell Complex-Augmented Generation for Textual Graph Question Answering
Sen Zhao, Lincheng Zhou, Yue Chen, Ding Zou
Abstract
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances the reasoning ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) by dynamically integrating external knowledge, thereby mitigating hallucinations and strengthening contextual grounding for structured data such as graphs. Nevertheless, most existing RAG variants for textual graphs concentrate on low-dimensional structures -- treating nodes as entities (0-dimensional) and edges or paths as pairwise or sequential relations (1-dimensional), but overlook cycles, which are crucial for reasoning over relational loops. Such cycles often arise in questions requiring closed-loop inference about similar objects or relative positions. This limitation often results in incomplete contextual grounding and restricted reasoning capability. In this work, we propose Topology-enhanced Retrieval-Augmented Generation (TopoRAG), a novel framework for textual graph question answering that effectively captures higher-dimensional topological and relational dependencies. Specifically, TopoRAG first lifts textual graphs into cellular complexes to model multi-dimensional topological structures. Leveraging these lifted representations, a topology-aware subcomplex retrieval mechanism is proposed to extract cellular complexes relevant to the input query, providing compact and informative topological context. Finally, a multi-dimensional topological reasoning mechanism operates over these complexes to propagate relational information and guide LLMs in performing structured, logic-aware inference. Empirical evaluations demonstrate that our method consistently surpasses existing baselines across diverse textual graph tasks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on22
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Reasoning on Graphs: Faithful and Interpretable Large Language Model ReasoningLinhao Luo, Yuan-Fang Li, Gholamreza Haffari, Shirui PanICLR 2024 · 499 citations
- Can Language Models Solve Graph Problems in Natural Language?Heng Wang, Shangbin Feng, Tianxing He, Zhaoxuan Tan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 420 citations
- G-Retriever: Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Textual Graph Understanding and Question AnsweringXiaoxin He, Yijun Tian, Yifei Sun, Nitesh V. Chawla et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 384 citations
Related papers
- You Don't Need Pre-Built Graphs for RAG: Retrieval Augmented Generation with Adaptive Reasoning StructuresShengyuan Chen, Chuang Zhou, Zheng Yuan, Qinggang Zhang et al.AAAI 2026 · 14 citations
- Iterative Multi-Granular RAG with Contextual Hierarchical GraphYanli Hu, Teng Liu, Zhuangyi Zhou, Weixin Zeng et al.AAAI 2026
- Why Retrieval-Augmented Generation Fails: A Graph PerspectiveKai Guo, Xinnan Dai, Zhibo Zhang, Nuohan Lin et al.KDD 2026
- Simple is Effective: The Roles of Graphs and Large Language Models in Knowledge-Graph-Based Retrieval-Augmented GenerationMufei Li, Siqi Miao, Pan LiICLR 2025
- TH-RAG : Topic-Based Hierarchical Knowledge Graphs for Robust Multi-hop Reasoning in Graph-based RAG SystemsJungHyoun Kim, Soohyeong Kim, Seok Jun Hwang, Jeonghyeon Park et al.ACL 2026
