Test-Time Training Can Close the Natural Distribution Shift Performance Gap in Deep Learning Based Compressed Sensing
Mohammad Zalbagi Darestani, Jiayu Liu, Reinhard Heckel
Abstract
Deep learning based image reconstruction methods outperform traditional methods. However, neural networks suffer from a performance drop when applied to images from a different distribution than the training images. For example, a model trained for reconstructing knees in accelerated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) does not reconstruct brains well, even though the same network trained on brains reconstructs brains perfectly well. Thus there is a distribution shift performance gap for a given neural network, defined as the difference in performance when training on a distribution and training on another distribution , and evaluating both models on . In this work, we propose a domain adaptation method for deep learning based compressive sensing that relies on self-supervision during training paired with test-time training at inference. We show that for four natural distribution shifts, this method essentially closes the distribution shift performance gap for state-of-the-art architectures for accelerated MRI.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 80d074e2-a6da-412a-ac5e-c9ebac3356b8Cited by top-tier papers11
- Test Time Adaptation via Conjugate Pseudo-labelsSachin Goyal, Mingjie Sun, Aditi Raghunathan, J. Zico KolterNeurIPS 2022 · 152 citations
- Scaling Laws For Deep Learning Based Image ReconstructionTobit Klug, Reinhard HeckelICLR 2023 · 22 citations
- Robustness of Deep Learning for Accelerated MRI: Benefits of Diverse Training DataKang Lin, Reinhard HeckelICML 2024 · 12 citations
- Prior Mismatch and Adaptation in PnP-ADMM with a Nonconvex Convergence AnalysisShirin Shoushtari, Jiaming Liu, Edward P. Chandler, M. Salman Asif et al.ICML 2024 · 9 citations
- Generalized Semi-Supervised Learning via Self-Supervised Feature AdaptationJiachen Liang, Ruibing Hou, Hong Chang, Bingpeng Ma et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 7 citations
Builds on16
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers With Localizable FeaturesSangdoo Yun, Dongyoon Han, Sanghyuk Chun, Seong Joon Oh et al.ICCV 2019 · 5,843 citations
- The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution GeneralizationDan Hendrycks, Steven Basart, Norman Mu, Saurav Kadavath et al.ICCV 2021 · 2,294 citations
- WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution ShiftsPang Wei Koh, Shiori Sagawa, Henrik Marklund, Sang Michael Xie et al.ICML 2021 · 1,773 citations
Related papers
- Measuring Robustness in Deep Learning Based Compressive SensingMohammad Zalbagi Darestani, Akshay S. Chaudhari, Reinhard HeckelICML 2021 · 94 citations
- MotionTTT: 2D Test-Time-Training Motion Estimation for 3D Motion Corrected MRITobit Klug, Kun Wang, Stefan Ruschke, Reinhard HeckelNeurIPS 2024 · 4 citations
- D2SA: Dual-Stage Distribution and Slice Adaptation for Efficient Test-Time Adaptation in MRI ReconstructionLipei Zhang, Rui Sun, Zhongying Deng, Yanqi Cheng et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- Bayesian Adaptation for Covariate ShiftAurick Zhou, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2021 · 40 citations
- Analyzing the Sample Complexity of Self-Supervised Image Reconstruction MethodsTobit Klug, Dogukan Atik, Reinhard HeckelNeurIPS 2023 · 13 citations
