Cluster-aware Semi-supervised Learning: Relational Knowledge Distillation Provably Learns Clustering
Yijun Dong, Kevin Miller, Qi Lei, Rachel A. Ward
Abstract
Despite the empirical success and practical significance of (relational) knowledge distillation that matches (the relations of) features between teacher and student models, the corresponding theoretical interpretations remain limited for various knowledge distillation paradigms. In this work, we take an initial step toward a theoretical understanding of relational knowledge distillation (RKD), with a focus on semi-supervised classification problems. We start by casting RKD as spectral clustering on a population-induced graph unveiled by a teacher model. Via a notion of clustering error that quantifies the discrepancy between the predicted and ground truth clusterings, we illustrate that RKD over the population provably leads to low clustering error. Moreover, we provide a sample complexity bound for RKD with limited unlabeled samples. For semi-supervised learning, we further demonstrate the label efficiency of RKD through a general framework of cluster-aware semi-supervised learning that assumes low clustering errors. Finally, by unifying data augmentation consistency regularization into this cluster-aware framework, we show that despite the common effect of learning accurate clusterings, RKD facilitates a "global" perspective through spectral clustering, whereas consistency regularization focuses on a "local" perspective via expansion.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 80d006bb-e513-4198-94af-8a0d3ac326d7Cited by top-tier papers3
- Learning Task-Agnostic Representations through Multi-Teacher DistillationPhilippe Formont, Maxime Darrin, Banafsheh Karimian, Eric Granger et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 6 citations
- Does Weak-to-strong Generalization Happen under Spurious Correlations?Chenruo Liu, Yijun Dong, Qi LeiICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Discrepancies are Virtue: Weak-to-Strong Generalization through Lens of Intrinsic DimensionYijun Dong, Yicheng Li, Yunai Li, Jason D. Lee et al.ICML 2025
Builds on18
- Bootstrap Your Own Latent - A New Approach to Self-Supervised LearningJean-Bastien Grill, Florian Strub, Florent Altché, Corentin Tallec et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 9,171 citations
- CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers With Localizable FeaturesSangdoo Yun, Dongyoon Han, Sanghyuk Chun, Seong Joon Oh et al.ICCV 2019 · 5,843 citations
- Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster AssignmentsMathilde Caron, Ishan Misra, Julien Mairal, Priya Goyal et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 5,249 citations
- FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and ConfidenceKihyuk Sohn, David Berthelot, Nicholas Carlini, Zizhao Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 5,129 citations
- Provable Guarantees for Self-Supervised Deep Learning with Spectral Contrastive LossJeff Z. HaoChen, Colin Wei, Adrien Gaidon, Tengyu MaNeurIPS 2021 · 425 citations
Related papers
- Semi-supervised Semantic Segmentation with Mutual Knowledge DistillationJianlong Yuan, Jinchao Ge, Zhibin Wang, Yifan LiuACM MM 2023 · 26 citations
- Cross-View Consistency Regularisation for Knowledge DistillationWeijia Zhang, Dongnan Liu, Weidong Cai, Chao MaACM MM 2024 · 11 citations
- AugKD: Ingenious Augmentations Empower Knowledge Distillation for Image Super-ResolutionYun Zhang, Wei Li, Simiao Li, Hanting Chen et al.ICLR 2025
- Self-Distillation from the Last Mini-Batch for Consistency RegularizationYiqing Shen, Liwu Xu, Yuzhe Yang, Yaqian Li et al.CVPR 2022 · 88 citations
- Regularizing Graph Neural Networks via Consistency-Diversity Graph AugmentationsDeyu Bo, Binbin Hu, Xiao Wang, Zhiqiang Zhang et al.AAAI 2022 · 35 citations
