USENIX Security2017Top-tier venue
A Longitudinal, End-to-End View of the DNSSEC Ecosystem
Taejoong Chung, Roland van Rijswijk-Deij, Balakrishnan Chandrasekaran, David R. Choffnes, Dave Levin, Bruce M. Maggs, Alan Mislove, Christo Wilson
Abstract
The Domain Name System's Security Extensions (DNSSEC) allow clients and resolvers to verify that DNS responses have not been forged or modified inflight. DNSSEC uses a public key infrastructure (PKI) to achieve this integrity, without which users can be subject to a wide range of attacks. However, DNSSEC can operate only if each of the principals in its PKI properly performs its management tasks: authoritative name servers must generate and publish their keys and signatures correctly, child zones that support DNSSEC must be correctly signed with their parent's keys, and resolvers must actually validate the chain of signatures. This paper performs the first large-scale, longitudinal measurement study into how well DNSSEC's PKI is managed. We use data from all DNSSEC-enabled subdomains under the .com, .org, and .net TLDs over a period of 21 months to analyze DNSSEC deployment and management by domains; we supplement this with active measurements of more than 59K DNS resolvers worldwide to evaluate resolver-side validation. Our investigation reveals pervasive mismanagement of the DNSSEC infrastructure. For example, we found that 31% of domains that support DNSSEC fail to publish all relevant records required for validation; 39% of the domains use insufficiently strong key-signing keys; and although 82% of resolvers in our study request DNSSEC records, only 12% of them actually attempt to validate them. These results highlight systemic problems, which motivate improved automation and auditing of DNSSEC management. KSK ZSK Name servers Domains Keys Domains Keys *.others
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 80744451-95a3-41f6-bc5a-09dbd4823393Cited by top-tier papers21
- Resident Evil: Understanding Residential IP Proxy as a Dark ServiceXianghang Mi, Xuan Feng, Xiaojing Liao, Baojun Liu et al.S&P 2019 · 80 citations
- How Great is the Great Firewall? Measuring China's DNS CensorshipNguyen Phong Hoang, Arian Akhavan Niaki, Jakub Dalek, Jeffrey Knockel et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 80 citations
- Who Is Answering My Queries: Understanding and Characterizing Interception of the DNS Resolution PathBaojun Liu, Chaoyi Lu, Hai-Xin Duan, Ying Liu et al.USENIX Security 2018 · 67 citations
- Cloud Strife: Mitigating the Security Risks of Domain-Validated CertificatesKevin Borgolte, Tobias Fiebig, Shuang Hao, Christopher Kruegel et al.NDSS 2018 · 63 citations
- DNS Cache Poisoning Attack: Resurrections with Side ChannelsKeyu Man, Xin'an Zhou, Zhiyun QianCCS 2021 · 33 citations
Related papers
- A Longitudinal and Comprehensive Study of the DANE Ecosystem in EmailHyeonmin Lee, Aniketh Gireesh, Roland van Rijswijk-Deij, Taekyoung Kwon et al.USENIX Security 2020
- A Large-scale and Longitudinal Measurement Study of DKIM DeploymentChuhan Wang, Kaiwen Shen, Minglei Guo, Yuxuan Zhao et al.USENIX Security 2022
- Your Shield is My Sword: A Persistent Denial-of-Service Attack via the Reuse of Unvalidated Caches in DNSSEC ValidationShuhan Zhang, Shuai Wang, Li Chen, Dan Li et al.USENIX Security 2025
- You've Got Report: Measurement and Security Implications of DMARC ReportingMd. Ishtiaq Ashiq, Weitong Li, Tobias Fiebig, Taejoong ChungUSENIX Security 2023
- Under the Hood of DANE Mismanagement in SMTPHyeonmin Lee, Md. Ishtiaq Ashiq, Moritz Müller, Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al.USENIX Security 2022
