Conditional Abstract Dialectical Frameworks
Jesse Heyninck, Matthias Thimm, Gabriele Kern-Isberner, Tjitze Rienstra, Kenneth Skiba
Abstract
Abstract dialectical frameworks (in short, ADFs) are a unifying model of formal argumentation, where argumentative relations between arguments are represented by assigning acceptance conditions to atomic arguments. This idea is generalized by letting acceptance conditions being assigned to complex formulas, resulting in conditional abstract dialectical frameworks (in short, cADFs). We define the semantics of cADFs in terms of a non-truth-functional four-valued logic, and study the semantics in-depth, by showing existence results and proving that all semantics are generalizations of the corresponding semantics for ADFs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Related papers
- Abstract Argumentation Framework with Conditional PreferencesGianvincenzo Alfano, Sergio Greco, Francesco Parisi, Irina TrubitsynaAAAI 2023 · 20 citations
- Incomplete Argumentation Frameworks: Properties and ComplexityGianvincenzo Alfano, Sergio Greco, Francesco Parisi, Irina TrubitsynaAAAI 2022 · 32 citations
- The Complexity Landscape of Claim-Augmented Argumentation FrameworksWolfgang Dvorák, Alexander Greßler, Anna Rapberger, Stefan WoltranAAAI 2021 · 15 citations
- Non-flat ABA Is an Instance of Bipolar ArgumentationMarkus Ulbricht, Nico Potyka, Anna Rapberger, Francesca ToniAAAI 2024 · 9 citations
- Argumentation Frameworks with Strong and Weak Constraints: Semantics and ComplexityGianvincenzo Alfano, Sergio Greco, Francesco Parisi, Irina TrubitsynaAAAI 2021 · 25 citations
