On Contraction of Sequential and Offset Rademacher Complexities
Adam Block, Alexander Rakhlin, Mark Sellke
Abstract
The Rademacher complexity of a function class is among the most basic notions of its ``size'' and yields classical offline generalization bounds for Lipschitz loss functions that lead in turn to a modern understanding of statistical learning. More recently, the sequential and offset Rademacher complexities were introduced to prove analogous generalization bounds for online learning and for prediction with squared loss. A fundamental structural result in the theory of Rademacher complexity, with many applications to learning theory, is the Ledoux--Talagrand contraction lemma, which states that the Rademacher complexity of a composition of a function class with a fixed Lipschitz function is at most that of the original class. We show that, under structural assumptions on the function class, this contraction extends to sequential and offset Rademacher complexity at the price of polylogarithmic factors. We further show that these logarithmic factors cannot be removed in general and, absent these additional structural assumptions, no such contraction inequality can hold. These results together indicate that the sequential and offset Rademacher complexities behave fundamentally differently from the classical Rademacher complexity with respect to contraction, which in turn has broad implications for understanding the sample complexities of online learning and regression with squared loss for composed function classes.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7f48704c-3d72-46c9-93d6-57f2f4238f68Builds on8
- Learning with little mixingIngvar M. Ziemann, Stephen TuNeurIPS 2022 · 41 citations
- Provable Model-based Nonlinear Bandit and Reinforcement Learning: Shelve Optimism, Embrace Virtual CurvatureKefan Dong, Jiaqi Yang, Tengyu MaNeurIPS 2021 · 39 citations
- The Statistical Complexity of Early-Stopped Mirror DescentTomas Vaskevicius, Varun Kanade, Patrick RebeschiniNeurIPS 2020 · 25 citations
- Adversarial laws of large numbers and optimal regret in online classificationNoga Alon, Omri Ben-Eliezer, Yuval Dagan, Shay Moran et al.STOC 2021 · 23 citations
- Littlestone Classes are Privately Online LearnableNoah Golowich, Roi LivniNeurIPS 2021 · 15 citations
Related papers
- Localization, Convexity, and Star AggregationSuhas VijaykumarNeurIPS 2021 · 10 citations
- A Non-Asymptotic Moreau Envelope Theory for High-Dimensional Generalized Linear ModelsLijia Zhou, Frederic Koehler, Pragya Sur, Danica J. Sutherland et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 13 citations
- Near-Optimal Algorithms for OmnipredictionPrincewill Okoroafor, Robert Kleinberg, Michael P. KimFOCS 2025 · 37 citations
- On Measuring Excess Capacity in Neural NetworksFlorian Graf, Sebastian Zeng, Bastian Rieck, Marc Niethammer et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 13 citations
- Tight and Fast Bounds for Multi-Label LearningYifan Zhang, Min-Ling ZhangICML 2025
