Lune

ACL2024Top-tier venue

Beyond Recognising Entailment: Formalising Natural Language Inference from an Argumentative Perspective

Ameer Saadat-Yazdi, Nadin Kökciyan

2024Year

Abstract

In argumentation theory, argument schemes are a characterisation of stereotypical patterns of inference. There has been little work done to develop computational approaches to identify these schemes in natural language. Moreover, advancements in recognizing textual entailment lack a standardized definition of inference, which makes it challenging to compare methods trained on different datasets and rely on the generalisability of their results. In this work, we propose a rigorous approach to align entailment recognition with argumentation theory. Wagemans' Periodic Table of Arguments (PTA), a taxonomy of argument schemes, provides the appropriate framework to unify these two fields. To operationalise the theoretical model, we introduce a tool to assist humans in annotating arguments according to the PTA. Beyond providing insights into non-expert annotator training, we present Kialo-PTA24, the first multi-topic dataset for the PTA. Finally, we benchmark the performance of pre-trained language models on various aspects of argument analysis. Our experiments show that the task of argument canonicalisation poses a significant challenge for state-of-the-art models, suggesting an inability to represent argumentative reasoning and a direction for future investigation.

  1. We conduct an annotation study to rephrase natural language arguments into structured templates and provide insights into how to train non-expert annotators to perform this analysis.

  2. We introduce ArgNotator, a tool that assists humans in annotating arguments according to the PTA.

  3. We construct Kialo-PTA24 -the first multi-topic dataset of argument types annotated according to the PTA.

  4. We compare the performance of state-of-theart models for two annotation subtasks. For the substance classification task, we benchmark the performance of a number of BERT-based models. For the argument canonicalisation task, we evaluate the performance of two large language models (FLAN-T5, LLAMA2) in both pre-trained and few-shot settings.

The dataset, experimental setup, annotation tool and training materials can all be found on GitLab. 1

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 7ee46c23-c338-45fb-9b7c-159124e79534

Builds on2

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines