Self-Supervised Color-Concept Association via Image Colorization
Ruizhen Hu, Ziqi Ye, Bin Chen, Oliver van Kaick, Hui Huang
Abstract
The interpretation of colors in visualizations is facilitated when the assignments between colors and concepts in the visualizations match human's expectations, implying that the colors can be interpreted in a semantic manner. However, manually creating a dataset of suitable associations between colors and concepts for use in visualizations is costly, as such associations would have to be collected from humans for a large variety of concepts. To address the challenge of collecting this data, we introduce a method to extract color-concept associations automatically from a set of concept images. While the state-of-the-art method extracts associations from data with supervised learning, we developed a self-supervised method based on colorization that does not require the preparation of ground truth color-concept associations. Our key insight is that a set of images of a concept should be sufficient for learning color-concept associations, since humans also learn to associate colors to concepts mainly from past visual input. Thus, we propose to use an automatic colorization method to extract statistical models of the color-concept associations that appear in concept images. Specifically, we take a colorization model pre-trained on ImageNet and fine-tune it on the set of images associated with a given concept, to predict pixel-wise probability distributions in Lab color space for the images. Then, we convert the predicted probability distributions into color ratings for a given color library and aggregate them for all the images of a concept to obtain the final color-concept associations. We evaluate our method using four different evaluation metrics and via a user study. Experiments show that, although the state-of-the-art method based on supervised learning with user-provided ratings is more effective at capturing relative associations, our self-supervised method obtains overall better results according to metrics like Earth Mover's Distance (EMD) and Entropy Difference (ED), which are closer to human perception of color distributions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on3
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Semantic Discriminability for Visual CommunicationKaren B. Schloss, Zachary Leggon, Laurent LessardIEEE VIS 2020 · 47 citations
- Context Matters: A Theory of Semantic Discriminability for Perceptual Encoding SystemsKushin Mukherjee, Brian Yin, Brianne E. Sherman, Laurent Lessard et al.IEEE VIS 2021 · 33 citations
Related papers
- Concept Generalization in Visual Representation LearningMert Bülent Sariyildiz, Yannis Kalantidis, Diane Larlus, Karteek AlahariICCV 2021 · 53 citations
- Unifying Effects of Direct and Relational Associations for Visual CommunicationMelissa A. Schoenlein, Johnny Campos, Kevin J. Lande, Laurent Lessard et al.IEEE VIS 2022 · 15 citations
- Skeleton Cloud Colorization for Unsupervised 3D Action Representation LearningSiyuan Yang, Jun Liu, Shijian Lu, Meng Hwa Er et al.ICCV 2021 · 114 citations
- The Pursuit of Human Labeling: A New Perspective on Unsupervised LearningArtyom Gadetsky, Maria BrbicNeurIPS 2023 · 10 citations
- Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentation for Large-Scale Point CloudYachao Zhang, Zhonghao Li, Yuan Xie, Yanyun Qu et al.AAAI 2021 · 116 citations
