SubLIME: Subset Selection via Rank Correlation Prediction for Data-Efficient LLM Evaluation
Gayathri Saranathan, Cong Xu, Mahammad Parwez Alam, Tarun Kumar, Martin Foltin, Soon Yee Wong, Suparna Bhattacharya
Abstract
The rapid expansion of Large Language Models (LLMs) and natural language processing datasets has made exhaustive benchmark evaluations computationally prohibitive. Inspired by high-stakes competitions like the International Mathematical Olympiad—where a few well-chosen problems suffice to differentiate top performers—we present SubLIME , which reduces evaluation costs by 80% to 99% while preserving ranking fidelity. It trains a Rank Correlation Prediction (RCP) model that combines limited performance data from only 5–20 anchor LLMs with dataset intrinsic metrics— Difficulty , Quality , and Distributional Dispersion —to predict how closely a candidate subset reflects full-benchmark rankings. Guided by these predictions, SubLIME selects a “winning” subset (1–20% of full set data) for evaluating new LLMs, preserving global rankings significant better than other data-efficient methods across ten diverse benchmarks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7dfd2456-12c3-4459-8652-505d07521106Cited by top-tier papers3
- When Replanning Becomes the Bottleneck: Budgeted Replanning for Embodied AgentsShuaijun Liu, Feiyang You, Xingwei Chen, Ningxin SuICML 2026
- SciCustom: A Framework for Custom Evaluation of Scientific Capabilities in Large Language ModelsYiyang Gu, Junwei Yang, Junyu Luo, Ye Yuan et al.ACL 2026
- Putting HUMANS first: Efficient LAM Evaluation with Human Preference AlignmentWoody Haosheng Gan, William Barr Held, Diyi YangACL 2026
Builds on5
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 3,037 citations
- Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningBen Sorscher, Robert Geirhos, Shashank Shekhar, Surya Ganguli et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 720 citations
- Data Selection for Language Models via Importance ResamplingSang Michael Xie, Shibani Santurkar, Tengyu Ma, Percy LiangNeurIPS 2023 · 383 citations
- MuSR: Testing the Limits of Chain-of-thought with Multistep Soft ReasoningZayne Sprague, Xi Ye, Kaj Bostrom, Swarat Chaudhuri et al.ICLR 2024 · 172 citations
Related papers
- How Benchmark Prediction from Fewer Data Misses the MarkGuanhua Zhang, Florian E. Dorner, Moritz HardtNeurIPS 2025 · 26 citations
- Active Evaluation Acquisition for Efficient LLM BenchmarkingYang Li, Jie Ma, Miguel Ballesteros, Yassine Benajiba et al.ICML 2025
- tinyBenchmarks: evaluating LLMs with fewer examplesFelipe Maia Polo, Lucas Weber, Leshem Choshen, Yuekai Sun et al.ICML 2024 · 212 citations
- Learning More from Less: Unlocking Internal Representations for Benchmark CompressionYueqi Zhang, Jin Hu, Shaoxiong Feng, Peiwen Yuan et al.ICML 2026
- MetaEval: Measuring the Discrimination of Benchmarks for Efficient LLM EvaluationZhuo Wang, Wen Wu, Guoqing Wang, Guangze Ye et al.AAAI 2026 · 1 citation
