Deceptive Fairness Attacks on Graphs via Meta Learning
Jian Kang, Yinglong Xia, Ross Maciejewski, Jiebo Luo, Hanghang Tong
Abstract
We study deceptive fairness attacks on graphs to answer the following question: How can we achieve poisoning attacks on a graph learning model to exacerbate the bias deceptively? We answer this question via a bi-level optimization problem and propose a meta learning-based framework named FATE. FATE is broadly applicable with respect to various fairness definitions and graph learning models, as well as arbitrary choices of manipulation operations. We further instantiate FATE to attack statistical parity and individual fairness on graph neural networks. We conduct extensive experimental evaluations on real-world datasets in the task of semi-supervised node classification. The experimental results demonstrate that FATE could amplify the bias of graph neural networks with or without fairness consideration while maintaining the utility on the downstream task. We hope this paper provides insights into the adversarial robustness of fair graph learning and can shed light on designing robust and fair graph learning in future studies.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7dba945d-a764-40ed-acda-2ae073e65394Cited by top-tier papers4
- Adversarial Attacks on Fairness of Graph Neural NetworksBinchi Zhang, Yushun Dong, Chen Chen, Yada Zhu et al.ICLR 2024 · 8 citations
- Are Your Models Still Fair? Fairness Attacks on Graph Neural Networks via Node InjectionsZihan Luo, Hong Huang, Yongkang Zhou, Jiping Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 4 citations
- Fair Graph Machine Learning under Adversarial Missingness ProcessesDebolina Halder Lina, Arlei SilvaICLR 2026
- On the Alignment between Fairness and Accuracy: from the Perspective of Adversarial RobustnessJunyi Chai, Taeuk Jang, Jing Gao, Xiaoqian WangICML 2025
Builds on12
- Shift-Robust GNNs: Overcoming the Limitations of Localized Graph Training dataQi Zhu, Natalia Ponomareva, Jiawei Han, Bryan PerozziNeurIPS 2021 · 152 citations
- On Dyadic Fairness: Exploring and Mitigating Bias in Graph ConnectionsPeizhao Li, Yifei Wang, Han Zhao, Pengyu Hong et al.ICLR 2021 · 142 citations
- Bursting the Filter Bubble: Fairness-Aware Network Link PredictionFarzan Masrour, Tyler Wilson, Heng Yan, Pang-Ning Tan et al.AAAI 2020 · 115 citations
- InFoRM: Individual Fairness on Graph MiningJian Kang, Jingrui He, Ross Maciejewski, Hanghang TongKDD 2020 · 99 citations
- Individual Fairness for Graph Neural Networks: A Ranking based ApproachYushun Dong, Jian Kang, Hanghang Tong, Jundong LiKDD 2021 · 88 citations
Related papers
- Uncertainty-Constrained Trustworthiness for Graph LearningChunhui Zhang, Pengqi Li, Lizhong Ding, Ye Yuan et al.ICML 2026
- Fair Graph Representation Learning via Diverse Mixture-of-ExpertsZheyuan Liu, Chunhui Zhang, Yijun Tian, Erchi Zhang et al.WWW 2023 · 43 citations
- Prompt as a Double-Edged Sword: A Dynamic Equilibrium Gradient-Assigned Attack against Graph Prompt LearningJu Jia, Jingxuan Yu, Di Wu, Cong Wu et al.KDD 2025 · 3 citations
- Certifying Graph Neural Networks Against Label and Structure PoisoningLukas Gosch, Xichuan Chen, Yan Scholten, Stephan GünnemannICML 2026
- Certified Defense on the Fairness of Graph Neural NetworksYushun Dong, Binchi Zhang, Hanghang Tong, Jundong LiKDD 2026 · 3 citations
