T2I-Scorer: Quantitative Evaluation on Text-to-Image Generation via Fine-Tuned Large Multi-Modal Models
Haoning Wu, Xiele Wu, Chunyi Li, Zicheng Zhang, Chaofeng Chen, Xiaohong Liu, Guangtao Zhai, Weisi Lin
Abstract
Text-to-image (T2I) generation is a pivotal and core interest within the realm of AI content generation. Amid the swift advancements of both open-source (such as Stable Diffusion) and proprietary (for example, DALLE, MidJourney) T2I models, there is a notable absence of a comprehensive and robust quantitative framework for evaluating their output quality. Traditional methods of quality assessment overlook the textual prompts when judging images; meanwhile, the advent of large multi-modal models (LMMs) introduces the capability to incorporate text prompts in evaluations, yet the challenge of fine-tuning these models for precise T2I quality assessment remains unresolved. In our study, we introduce the T2I-Scorer, a novel two-stage training methodology aimed at fine-tuning LMMs for T2I evaluation. For the first stage, we collect 397K GPT-4V-labeled question-answer pairs related to T2I evaluation. Termed as T2I-ITD, the pseudo-labeled dataset is analyzed and examined by human, and used for instruction tuning to improve the LMM's low-level quality perception. The first stage model, T2I-Scorer-IT, has reached superior accuracy on T2I evaluation than all kinds of existing T2I metrics under zero-shot settings. For the second stage, we define an explicit multi-task training scheme to further align the LMM with human opinion scores, and the fine-tuned T2I-Scorer can reach state-of-the-art accuracy on both image quality and image-text alignment perspectives with significant improvements. We anticipate the proposed metrics can serve as a reliable metric to gauge the ability of T2I generation models in the future. We will make code, data, and weights publicly available.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Cited by top-tier papers4
- Cap: Evaluation of Persuasive and Creative Image GenerationAysan Aghazadeh, Adriana KovashkaICCV 2025 · 9 citations
- Adaptive Routing of Text-to-Image Generation Requests between Large Cloud Model and Light-Weight Edge ModelZewei Xin, Qinya Li, Chaoyue Niu, Fan Wu et al.ICCV 2025 · 2 citations
- Evaluating Visual Narrative Coherence in Story Visualization via Diversified StorylinesMinha Jhang, Kyeongman Park, Hyukhun Koh, Kyomin JungACL 2026
- VisualScore: Learning Holistic Visual Quality Scores via Multi-Task ReasoningYiting Lu, Fengbin Guan, Yixin Gao, Yan Zhong et al.ICML 2026
Related papers
- Automatic Evaluation for Text-to-image Generation: Task-decomposed Framework, Distilled Training, and Meta-evaluation BenchmarkRong-Cheng Tu, Zi-Ao Ma, Tian Lan, Yuehao Zhao et al.ACL 2025 · 13 citations
- Image Regeneration: Evaluating Text-to-Image Model via Generating Identical Image with Multimodal Large Language ModelsChutian Meng, Fan Ma, Jiaxu Miao, Chi Zhang et al.AAAI 2025 · 1 citation
- Revisiting MLLM Based Image Quality Assessment: Errors and RemedyZhenchen Tang, Songlin Yang, Bo Peng, Zichuan Wang et al.AAAI 2026 · 2 citations
- ScImage: How good are multimodal large language models at scientific text-to-image generation?Leixin Zhang, Steffen Eger, Yinjie Cheng, Weihe Zhai et al.ICLR 2025
- Score2Instruct: Scaling Up Video Quality-Centric Instructions via Automated Dimension ScoringQizhi Xie, Kun Yuan, Yunpeng Qu, Jiachao Gong et al.CVPR 2026
