Architecting Selective Refresh based Multi-Retention Cache for Heterogeneous System (ARMOUR)
Sukarn Agarwal, Shounak Chakraborty, Magnus Själander
Abstract
The increasing use of chiplets, and the demand for high-performance yet low-power systems, will result in heterogeneous systems that combine both CPUs and accelerators (e.g., general-purpose GPUs). Chiplet based designs also enable the inclusion of emerging memory technologies, since such technologies can reside on a separate chiplet without requiring complex integration in existing high-performance process technologies. One such emerging memory technology is spin-transfer torque (STT) memory, which has the potential to replace SRAM as the last-level cache (LLC). STT-RAM has the advantage of high density, non-volatility, and reduced leakage power, but suffers from a higher write latency and energy, as compared to SRAM. However, by relaxing the retention time, the write latency and energy can be reduced at the cost of the STT-RAM becoming more volatile. The retention time and write latency/energy can be traded against each other by creating an LLC with multiple retention zones. With a multi-retention LLC, the challenge is to direct the memory accesses to the most advantageous zone, to optimize for overall performance and energy efficiency. We propose ARMOUR, a mechanism for efficient management of memory accesses to a multi-retention LLC, where based on the initial requester (CPU or GPU) the cache blocks are allocated in the high (CPU) or low (GPU) retention zone. Furthermore, blocks that are about to expire are either refreshed (CPU) or written back (GPU). In addition, ARMOUR evicts CPU blocks with an estimated short lifetime, which further improves cache performance by reducing cache pollution. Our evaluation shows that ARMOUR improves average performance by 28.9% compared to a baseline STT-RAM based LLC and reduces the energy-delay product (EDP) by 74.5% compared to an iso-area SRAM LLC.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Related papers
- LRM-GPU: Alleviating Synchronization Overhead for Multi-Chiplet GPU ArchitectureBaiqing Zhong, Zhirong Ye, Xiaojie Li, Peilin Wang et al.HPCA 2026
- zeroTT: A Two-Step State Transition Avoidance Scheme for MLC STT-RAMDong Yin, Huizhang Luo, Jeff Zhang, Mingxing Duan et al.DAC 2024 · 1 citation
- SAC: Sharing-Aware Caching in Multi-Chip GPUsShiqing Zhang, Mahmood Naderan-Tahan, Magnus Jahre, Lieven EeckhoutISCA 2023 · 18 citations
- SMILE: LLC-based Shared Memory Expansion to Improve GPU Thread Level ParallelismTianyu Guo, Xuanteng Huang, Kan Wu, Xianwei Zhang et al.DAC 2024 · 3 citations
- Leveraging Chiplet-Locality for Efficient Memory Mapping in Multi-Chip Module GPUsJunhyeok Park, Sungbin Jang, Osang Kwon, Yongho Lee et al.MICRO 2025 · 7 citations
