Select-Then-Decompose: From Empirical Analysis to Adaptive Selection Strategy for Task Decomposition in Large Language Models
Shuodi Liu, Yingzhuo Liu, Zi Wang, Yusheng Wang, Huijia Wu, Liuyu Xiang, Zhaofeng He
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable reasoning and planning capabilities, driving extensive research into task decomposition. Existing task decomposition methods focus primarily on memory, tool usage, and feedback mechanisms, achieving notable success in specific domains, but they often overlook the trade-off between performance and cost. In this study, we first conduct a comprehensive investigation on task decomposition, identifying six categorization schemes. Then, we perform an empirical analysis of three factors that influence the performance and cost of task decomposition: categories of approaches, characteristics of tasks, and configuration of decomposition and execution models, uncovering three critical insights and summarizing a set of practical principles. Building on this analysis, we propose the Select-Then-Decompose strategy, which establishes a closed-loop problemsolving process composed of three stages: selection, execution, and verification. This strategy dynamically selects the most suitable decomposition approach based on task characteristics and enhances the reliability of the results through a verification module. Comprehensive evaluations across multiple benchmarks show that the Select-Then-Decompose consistently lies on the Pareto frontier, demonstrating an optimal balance between performance and cost. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/summervvind/ Select-Then-Decompose .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7d6ebaa2-b464-49e3-aed1-589038d9f851Builds on11
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learningNoah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,828 citations
- HuggingGPT: Solving AI Tasks with ChatGPT and its Friends in Hugging FaceYongliang Shen, Kaitao Song, Xu Tan, Dongsheng Li et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,778 citations
- PAL: Program-aided Language ModelsLuyu Gao, Aman Madaan, Shuyan Zhou, Uri Alon et al.ICML 2023 · 700 citations
- Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language ModelsLei Wang, Wanyu Xu, Yihuai Lan, Zhiqiang Hu et al.ACL 2023 · 249 citations
Related papers
- Disentangling Memory and Reasoning Ability in Large Language ModelsMingyu Jin, Weidi Luo, Sitao Cheng, Xinyi Wang et al.ACL 2025
- On the Eligibility of LLMs for Counterfactual Reasoning: A Decompositional StudyShuai Yang, Qi Yang, Luoxi Tang, Yuqiao Meng et al.ICLR 2026 · 9 citations
- A Thorough Examination of Decoding Methods in the Era of LLMsChufan Shi, Haoran Yang, Deng Cai, Zhisong Zhang et al.EMNLP 2024 · 26 citations
- AdaPlanner: Adaptive Planning from Feedback with Language ModelsHaotian Sun, Yuchen Zhuang, Lingkai Kong, Bo Dai et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 257 citations
- Small LLMs Are Weak Tool Learners: A Multi-LLM AgentWeizhou Shen, Chenliang Li, Hongzhan Chen, Ming Yan et al.EMNLP 2024 · 18 citations
