Pruning Deep Neural Networks from a Sparsity Perspective
Enmao Diao, Ganghua Wang, Jiawei Zhang, Yuhong Yang, Jie Ding, Vahid Tarokh
Abstract
In recent years, deep network pruning has attracted significant attention in order to enable the rapid deployment of AI into small devices with computation and memory constraints. Pruning is often achieved by dropping redundant weights, neurons, or layers of a deep network while attempting to retain a comparable test performance. Many deep pruning algorithms have been proposed with impressive empirical success. However, existing approaches lack a quantifiable measure to estimate the compressibility of a sub-network during each pruning iteration and thus may underprune or over-prune the model. In this work, we propose PQ Index (PQI) to measure the potential compressibility of deep neural networks and use this to develop a Sparsity-informed Adaptive Pruning (SAP) algorithm. Our extensive experiments corroborate the hypothesis that for a generic pruning procedure, PQI decreases first when a large model is being effectively regularized and then increases when its compressibility reaches a limit that appears to correspond to the beginning of underfitting. Subsequently, PQI decreases again when the model collapse and significant deterioration in the performance of the model start to occur. Additionally, our experiments demonstrate that the proposed adaptive pruning algorithm with proper choice of hyper-parameters is superior to the iterative pruning algorithms such as the lottery ticket-based pruning methods, in terms of both compression efficiency and robustness. Our code is available here.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers10
- Pruner-Zero: Evolving Symbolic Pruning Metric From Scratch for Large Language ModelsPeijie Dong, Lujun Li, Zhenheng Tang, Xiang Liu et al.ICML 2024 · 64 citations
- Large Learning Rates Simultaneously Achieve Robustness to Spurious Correlations and CompressibilityMelih Barsbey, Lucas Prieto, Stefanos Zafeiriou, Tolga BirdalICCV 2025 · 3 citations
- On the Interaction of Compressibility and Adversarial RobustnessMelih Barsbey, Antônio H. Ribeiro, Umut Simsekli, Tolga BirdalICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- Fisher Information-based Efficient Curriculum Federated Learning with Large Language ModelsJi Liu, Jiaxiang Ren, Ruoming Jin, Zijie Zhang et al.EMNLP 2024 · 3 citations
- Cannistraci-Hebb Training on Ultra-Sparse Spiking Neural NetworksYuan Hua, Jilin Zhang, Yingtao Zhang, Leyi You et al.ICLR 2026 · 2 citations
Builds on7
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Rigging the Lottery: Making All Tickets WinnersUtku Evci, Trevor Gale, Jacob Menick, Pablo Samuel Castro et al.ICML 2020 · 723 citations
- Comparing Rewinding and Fine-tuning in Neural Network PruningAlex Renda, Jonathan Frankle, Michael CarbinICLR 2020 · 437 citations
- HeteroFL: Computation and Communication Efficient Federated Learning for Heterogeneous ClientsEnmao Diao, Jie Ding, Vahid TarokhICLR 2021 · 179 citations
- Good Subnetworks Provably Exist: Pruning via Greedy Forward SelectionMao Ye, Chengyue Gong, Lizhen Nie, Denny Zhou et al.ICML 2020 · 123 citations
Related papers
- Robust Pruning at InitializationSoufiane Hayou, Jean-Francois Ton, Arnaud Doucet, Yee Whye TehICLR 2021 · 50 citations
- DropNet: Reducing Neural Network Complexity via Iterative PruningChong Min John Tan, Mehul MotaniICML 2020 · 74 citations
- Provable Filter Pruning for Efficient Neural NetworksLucas Liebenwein, Cenk Baykal, Harry Lang, Dan Feldman et al.ICLR 2020 · 161 citations
- Pruning neural networks without any data by iteratively conserving synaptic flowHidenori Tanaka, Daniel Kunin, Daniel L. K. Yamins, Surya GanguliNeurIPS 2020 · 884 citations
- Plant 'n' Seek: Can You Find the Winning Ticket?Jonas Fischer, Rebekka BurkholzICLR 2022 · 21 citations
