When Additive Noise Meets Unobserved Mediators: Bivariate Denoising Diffusion for Causal Discovery
Dominik Meier, Sujai Hiremath, Promit Ghosal, Kyra Gan
Abstract
Distinguishing cause and effect from bivariate observational data is a foundational problem in many disciplines, but challenging without additional assumptions. Additive noise models (ANMs) are widely used to enable sample-efficient bivariate causal discovery. However, conventional ANM-based methods fail when unobserved mediators corrupt the causal relationship between variables. This paper makes three key contributions: first, we rigorously characterize why standard ANM approaches break down in the presence of unmeasured mediators. Second, we demonstrate that prior solutions for hidden mediation are brittle in finite sample settings, limiting their practical utility. To address these gaps, we propose Bivariate Denoising Diffusion (BiDD) for causal discovery, a method designed to handle latent noise introduced by unmeasured mediators. Unlike prior methods that infer directionality through mean squared error loss comparisons, our approach introduces a novel independence test statistic: during the noising and denoising processes for each variable, we condition on the other variable as input and evaluate the independence of the predicted noise relative to this input. We prove asymptotic consistency of BiDD under the ANM, and conjecture that it performs well under hidden mediation. Experiments on synthetic and real-world data demonstrate consistent performance, outperforming existing methods in mediator-corrupted settings while maintaining strong performance in mediator-free settings.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7d18f30d-8e90-450c-a385-6074ebde6f08Builds on16
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion ModelsRobin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser et al.CVPR 2022 · 13,123 citations
- On the Role of Sparsity and DAG Constraints for Learning Linear DAGsIgnavier Ng, AmirEmad Ghassami, Kun ZhangNeurIPS 2020 · 306 citations
- DAGMA: Learning DAGs via M-matrices and a Log-Determinant Acyclicity CharacterizationKevin Bello, Bryon Aragam, Pradeep RavikumarNeurIPS 2022 · 222 citations
- Beware of the Simulated DAG! Causal Discovery Benchmarks May Be Easy to GameAlexander G. Reisach, Christof Seiler, Sebastian WeichwaldNeurIPS 2021 · 213 citations
Related papers
- Optimal Transport for Causal DiscoveryRuibo Tu, Kun Zhang, Hedvig Kjellström, Cheng ZhangICLR 2022 · 24 citations
- Distinguishing Cause from Effect with Causal Velocity ModelsJohnny Xi, Hugh Dance, Peter Orbanz, Benjamin Bloem-ReddyICML 2025
- Distinguishing Cause from Effect Using Quantiles: Bivariate Quantile Causal DiscoveryNatasa Tagasovska, Valérie Chavez-Demoulin, Thibault VatterICML 2020 · 50 citations
- MissDAG: Causal Discovery in the Presence of Missing Data with Continuous Additive Noise ModelsErdun Gao, Ignavier Ng, Mingming Gong, Li Shen et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 36 citations
- Identification of Causal Structure in the Presence of Missing Data with Additive Noise ModelJie Qiao, Zhengming Chen, Jianhua Yu, Ruichu Cai et al.AAAI 2024 · 7 citations
