DP-SGD Without Clipping: The Lipschitz Neural Network Way
Louis Béthune, Thomas Massena, Thibaut Boissin, Aurélien Bellet, Franck Mamalet, Yannick Prudent, Corentin Friedrich, Mathieu Serrurier, David Vigouroux
Abstract
State-of-the-art approaches for training Differentially Private (DP) Deep Neural Networks (DNN) face difficulties to estimate tight bounds on the sensitivity of the network's layers, and instead rely on a process of per-sample gradient clipping. This clipping process not only biases the direction of gradients but also proves costly both in memory consumption and in computation. To provide sensitivity bounds and bypass the drawbacks of the clipping process, we propose to rely on Lipschitz constrained networks. Our theoretical analysis reveals an unexplored link between the Lipschitz constant with respect to their input and the one with respect to their parameters. By bounding the Lipschitz constant of each layer with respect to its parameters, we prove that we can train these networks with privacy guarantees. Our analysis not only allows the computation of the aforementioned sensitivities at scale, but also provides guidance on how to maximize the gradient-to-noise ratio for fixed privacy guarantees. The code has been released as a Python package available at https://github.com/Algue-Rythme/lip-dp * Equal contribution.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers8
- Direct Parameterization of Lipschitz-Bounded Deep NetworksRuigang Wang, Ian R. ManchesterICML 2023 · 66 citations
- ATRI: Mitigating Multilingual Audio Text Retrieval Inconsistencies by Reducing Data Distribution ErrorsYuguo Yin, Yuxin Xie, Wenyuan Yang, Dongchao Yang et al.ACL 2025 · 12 citations
- Slicing Mutual Information Generalization Bounds for Neural NetworksKimia Nadjahi, Kristjan H. Greenewald, Rickard Brüel Gabrielsson, Justin SolomonICML 2024 · 5 citations
- Vision Transformer Finetuning Benefits from Non-Smooth ComponentsAmbroise Odonnat, Chapel Laetitia, Romain Tavenard, Ievgen RedkoICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Convergent Privacy Loss of Noisy-SGD without Convexity and SmoothnessEli Chien, Pan LiICLR 2025
Builds on26
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- MLP-Mixer: An all-MLP Architecture for VisionIlya O. Tolstikhin, Neil Houlsby, Alexander Kolesnikov, Lucas Beyer et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 3,862 citations
- Large Language Models Can Be Strong Differentially Private LearnersXuechen Li, Florian Tramèr, Percy Liang, Tatsunori HashimotoICLR 2022 · 502 citations
- Systematic Evaluation of Privacy Risks of Machine Learning ModelsLiwei Song, Prateek MittalUSENIX Security 2021 · 483 citations
Related papers
- Differentially Private SGD Without Clipping Bias: An Error-Feedback ApproachXinwei Zhang, Zhiqi Bu, Steven Wu, Mingyi HongICLR 2024 · 15 citations
- Beyond Uniform Lipschitz Condition in Differentially Private OptimizationRudrajit Das, Satyen Kale, Zheng Xu, Tong Zhang et al.ICML 2023 · 24 citations
- Understanding Gradient Clipping in Private SGD: A Geometric PerspectiveXiangyi Chen, Zhiwei Steven Wu, Mingyi HongNeurIPS 2020 · 254 citations
- SaGD: A Node-Level Differentially Private Graph Learning Framework with Sensitivity-Aware Gradient DescentJianxin Wei, Ergute Bao, Xiaokui Xiao, Ting YuWWW 2026
- Differentially Private Sharpness-Aware TrainingJinseong Park, Hoki Kim, Yujin Choi, Jaewook LeeICML 2023 · 15 citations
