Coordinating Followers to Reach Better Equilibria: End-to-End Gradient Descent for Stackelberg Games
Kai Wang, Lily Xu, Andrew Perrault, Michael K. Reiter, Milind Tambe
Abstract
A growing body of work in game theory extends the traditional Stackelberg game to settings with one leader and multiple followers who play a Nash equilibrium. Standard approaches for computing equilibria in these games reformulate the followers' best response as constraints in the leader's optimization problem. These reformulation approaches can sometimes be effective, but make limiting assumptions on the followers' objectives and the equilibrium reached by followers, e.g., uniqueness, optimism, or pessimism. To overcome these limitations, we run gradient descent to update the leader's strategy by differentiating through the equilibrium reached by followers. Our approach generalizes to any stochastic equilibrium selection procedure that chooses from multiple equilibria, where we compute the stochastic gradient by back-propagating through a sampled Nash equilibrium using the solution to a partial differential equation to establish the unbiasedness of the stochastic gradient. Using the unbiased gradient estimate, we implement the gradient-based approach to solve three Stackelberg problems with multiple followers. Our approach consistently outperforms existing baselines to achieve higher utility for the leader.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7b5e68ef-8ec9-47a5-b36d-07b77871cdb4Cited by top-tier papers10
- Oracles & Followers: Stackelberg Equilibria in Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningMatthias Gerstgrasser, David C. ParkesICML 2023 · 27 citations
- Learning to Mitigate AI Collusion on Economic PlatformsGianluca Brero, Eric Mibuari, Nicolas Lepore, David C. ParkesNeurIPS 2022 · 22 citations
- Contextual Bilevel Reinforcement Learning for Incentive AlignmentVinzenz Thoma, Barna Pásztor, Andreas Krause, Giorgia Ramponi et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 21 citations
- First-Order Methods for Linearly Constrained Bilevel OptimizationGuy Kornowski, Swati Padmanabhan, Kai Wang, Zhe Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 21 citations
- Multi-Sender Persuasion: A Computational PerspectiveSafwan Hossain, Tonghan Wang, Tao Lin, Yiling Chen et al.ICML 2024 · 14 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- Stackelberg Actor-Critic: Game-Theoretic Reinforcement Learning AlgorithmsLiyuan Zheng, Tanner Fiez, Zane Alumbaugh, Benjamin Chasnov et al.AAAI 2022 · 50 citations
- Adversarial Regularization as Stackelberg Game: An Unrolled Optimization ApproachSimiao Zuo, Chen Liang, Haoming Jiang, Xiaodong Liu et al.EMNLP 2021 · 4 citations
- Learning in Stackelberg Mean Field Games: A Non-Asymptotic AnalysisSihan Zeng, Benjamin Patrick Evans, Sujay Bhatt, Leo Ardon et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- Optimally Deceiving a Learning Leader in Stackelberg GamesGeorgios Birmpas, Jiarui Gan, Alexandros Hollender, Francisco J. Marmolejo Cossío et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 25 citations
- Approximating Nash Equilibria in Normal-Form Games via Stochastic OptimizationIan Gemp, Luke Marris, Georgios PiliourasICLR 2024 · 14 citations
