Manipulating OpenFlow Link Discovery Packet Forwarding for Topology Poisoning
Mingming Chen, Thomas La Porta, Teryl Taylor, Frederico Araujo, Trent Jaeger
Abstract
Software-defined networking (SDN) is a centralized, dynamic, and programmable network management technology that enables flexible traffic control and scalability. SDN facilitates network administration through a centralized view of the underlying physical topology; tampering with this topology view can result in catastrophic damage to network management and security. To underscore this issue, we introduce Marionette, a new topology poisoning technique that manipulates OpenFlow link discovery packet forwarding to alter topology information. Our approach exposes an overlooked yet widespread attack vector, distinguishing itself from traditional link fabrication attacks that tamper, spoof, or relay discovery packets at the data plane. Unlike localized attacks observed in existing methods, our technique introduces a globalized topology poisoning attack that leverages control privileges. Marionette implements a reinforcement learning algorithm to compute a poisoned topology target, and injects flow entries to achieve a long-lived stealthy attack. Our evaluation shows that Marionette successfully attacks five opensource controllers and nine OpenFlow-based discovery protocols. Marionette overcomes the state-of-the-art topology poisoning defenses, showcasing a new class of topology poisoning that initiates on the control plane. This security vulnerability was ethically disclosed to OpenDaylight, and CVE-2024-37018 has been assigned. CCS CONCEPTS • Security and privacy → Distributed systems security; Security protocols; • Networks → Link-layer protocols.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7b47d87c-93a7-4483-9dfb-4d428d695bd1Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on4
- Cross-App Poisoning in Software-Defined NetworkingBenjamin E. Ujcich, Samuel Jero, Anne Edmundson, Qi Wang et al.CCS 2018 · 62 citations
- Causal Analysis for Software-Defined Networking AttacksBenjamin E. Ujcich, Samuel Jero, Richard Skowyra, Adam Bates et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 26 citations
- When Match Fields Do Not Need to Match: Buffered Packets Hijacking in SDNJiahao Cao, Renjie Xie, Kun Sun, Qi Li et al.NDSS 2020
- Intender: Fuzzing Intent-Based Networking with Intent-State Transition GuidanceJiwon Kim, Benjamin E. Ujcich, Dave TianUSENIX Security 2023
Related papers
- SDN Application Backdoor: Disrupting the Service via Poisoning the TopologyShuhua Deng, Xian Qing, Xiaofan Li, Xing Gao et al.INFOCOM 2023 · 8 citations
- An In-depth Look Into SDN Topology Discovery Mechanisms: Novel Attacks and Practical CountermeasuresEduard Marin, Nicola Bucciol, Mauro ContiCCS 2019 · 60 citations
- The CrossPath Attack: Disrupting the SDN Control Channel via Shared LinksJiahao Cao, Qi Li, Renjie Xie, Kun Sun et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 68 citations
- Unexpected Data Dependency Creation and Chaining: A New Attack to SDNFeng Xiao, Jinquan Zhang, Jianwei Huang, Guofei Gu et al.S&P 2020 · 31 citations
- Attacking the Brain: Races in the SDN Control PlaneLei Xu, Jeff Huang, Sungmin Hong, Jialong Zhang et al.USENIX Security 2017 · 77 citations
