Decision-Focused Learning via Tangent-Space Projection of Prediction Error
Junhyeong Lee, Sangjin Jin, Yongjae Lee
Abstract
Decision-Focused Learning (DFL) trains predictors to improve downstream decision quality, but computing regret gradients typically requires differentiating through solvers or relying on surrogate losses, which can be computationally expensive or deviate from the true objective. We show that, under standard regularity with locally stable active constraints, the regret gradient admits a closed-form geometric characterization, equivalent to the prediction error projected onto the tangent space of active constraints, scaled by local curvature. This reveals that regret gradients can be obtained by filtering decision-irrelevant components from the MSE gradient, providing a simpler and more direct alternative to existing approaches. We propose PEAR (Projected Error As Regret-gradient), which computes regret gradients via a reduced linear system over active constraints, avoiding differentiation through solver iterations or additional optimization solves. Experiments on LP benchmarks and a real-world QP task show that PEAR achieves the best decision quality among all baselines while being the most computationally efficient, with gains that persist under constraint shifts. Code is available at .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7b2356de-4339-4e83-b712-d1d1bb4d5feaBuilds on12
- Are Transformers Effective for Time Series Forecasting?Ailing Zeng, Muxi Chen, Lei Zhang, Qiang XuAAAI 2023 · 3,619 citations
- Reversible Instance Normalization for Accurate Time-Series Forecasting against Distribution ShiftTaesung Kim, Jinhee Kim, Yunwon Tae, Cheonbok Park et al.ICLR 2022 · 1,020 citations
- Efficient and Modular Implicit DifferentiationMathieu Blondel, Quentin Berthet, Marco Cuturi, Roy Frostig et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 386 citations
- Differentiation of Blackbox Combinatorial SolversMarin Vlastelica Pogancic, Anselm Paulus, Vít Musil, Georg Martius et al.ICLR 2020 · 341 citations
- Smart Predict-and-Optimize for Hard Combinatorial Optimization ProblemsJayanta Mandi, Emir Demirovic, Peter J. Stuckey, Tias GunsAAAI 2020 · 184 citations
Related papers
- Decision-Focused Learning without Decision-Making: Learning Locally Optimized Decision LossesSanket Shah, Kai Wang, Bryan Wilder, Andrew Perrault et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 79 citations
- Solver-Free Decision-Focused Learning for Linear Optimization ProblemsSenne Berden, Ali Irfan Mahmutogullari, Dimos Tsouros, Tias GunsNeurIPS 2025 · 13 citations
- A Solver-Free Training Method for Predict-then-OptimizeBeichen Wan, Mo LiuICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Online Decision-Focused LearningAymeric Capitaine, Maxime Haddouche, Eric Moulines, Michael I. Jordan et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- Feasibility-Aware Decision-Focused Learning for Predicting Parameters in the ConstraintsJayanta Mandi, Marianne Defresne, Senne Berden, Tias GunsNeurIPS 2025 · 9 citations
