Analyzing Norm Violations in Live-Stream Chat
Jihyung Moon, Dong-Ho Lee, Hyundong Cho, Woojeong Jin, Chan Young Park, Minwoo Kim, Jonathan May, Jay Pujara, Sungjoon Park
Abstract
Toxic language, such as hate speech, can deter users from participating in online communities and enjoying popular platforms. Previous approaches to detecting toxic language and norm violations have been primarily concerned with conversations from online forums and social media, such as Reddit and Twitter. These approaches are less effective when applied to conversations on live-streaming platforms, such as Twitch and YouTube Live, as each comment is only visible for a limited time and lacks a thread structure that establishes its relationship with other comments. In this work, we share the first NLP study dedicated to detecting norm violations in conversations on live-streaming platforms. We define norm violation categories in live-stream chats and annotate 4,583 moderated comments from Twitch. We articulate several facets of live-stream data that differ from other forums, and demonstrate that existing models perform poorly in this setting. By conducting a user study, we identify the informational context humans use in live-stream moderation, and train models leveraging context to identify norm violations. Our results show that appropriate contextual information can boost moderation performance by 35%. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7aa05266-f36d-463b-b880-e2080371c91cCited by top-tier papers2
- Legilimens: Practical and Unified Content Moderation for Large Language Model ServicesJialin Wu, Jiangyi Deng, Shengyuan Pang, Yanjiao Chen et al.CCS 2024 · 5 citations
- Understanding Fanchuan in Livestreaming Platforms: A New Form of Online Antisocial BehaviorYiluo Wei, Jiahui He, Gareth TysonCSCW 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on5
- Latent Hatred: A Benchmark for Understanding Implicit Hate SpeechMai ElSherief, Caleb Ziems, David Muchlinski, Vaishnavi Anupindi et al.EMNLP 2021 · 159 citations
- "Did You Miss My Comment or What?" Understanding Toxicity in Open Source DiscussionsCourtney Miller, Sophie Cohen, Daniel Klug, Bogdan Vasilescu et al.ICSE 2022 · 54 citations
- Social Bias Frames: Reasoning about Social and Power Implications of LanguageMaarten Sap, Saadia Gabriel, Lianhui Qin, Dan Jurafsky et al.ACL 2020 · 16 citations
- Toxicity Detection: Does Context Really Matter?John Pavlopoulos, Jeffrey Sorensen, Lucas Dixon, Nithum Thain et al.ACL 2020 · 11 citations
- ToxiGen: A Large-Scale Machine-Generated Dataset for Adversarial and Implicit Hate Speech DetectionThomas Hartvigsen, Saadia Gabriel, Hamid Palangi, Maarten Sap et al.ACL 2022
Related papers
- Silencing Empowerment, Allowing Bigotry: Auditing the Moderation of Hate Speech on TwitchPrarabdh Shukla, Wei Yin Chong, Yash Patel, Brennan Schaffner et al.ACL 2025 · 3 citations
- Toxicity Detection is NOT all you Need: Measuring the Gaps to Supporting Volunteer Content Moderators through a User-Centric MethodYang Trista Cao, Lovely-Frances Domingo, Sarah A. Gilbert, Michelle L. Mazurek et al.EMNLP 2024 · 4 citations
- Coordination and Collaboration: How do Volunteer Moderators Work as a Team in Live Streaming Communities?Jie Cai, Donghee Yvette WohnCHI 2022 · 34 citations
- Hate Raids on Twitch: Understanding Real-Time Human-Bot Coordinated Attacks in Live Streaming CommunitiesJie Cai, Sagnik Chowdhury, Hongyang Zhou, Donghee Yvette WohnCSCW 2023 · 17 citations
- Proximate Social Factors in First-Time Contribution to Online CommunitiesJoseph Seering, Jessica Hammer, Geoff Kaufman, Diyi YangCHI 2020 · 10 citations
