Cooperative Dynamics of Censorship, Misinformation, and Influence Operations: Insights from the Global South and U.S
Zaid Hakami, Yuzhou Feng, Bogdan Carbunar
Abstract
Censorship and the distribution of false information, tools used to manipulate what users see and believe, are seemingly at opposite ends of the information access spectrum. Most previous work has examined them in isolation and within individual countries, leaving gaps in our understanding of how these information manipulation tools interact and reinforce each other across diverse societies. In this paper, we study perceptions about the interplay between censorship, false information, and influence operations, gathered through a mixed-methods study consisting of a survey (n = 384) and semi-structured interviews (n = 30) with participants who have experienced these phenomena across diverse countries in both the Global South and Global North, including Bangladesh, China, Cuba, Iran, Venezuela, and the United States. Our findings reveal perceptions of cooperation across various platforms between distinct entities working together to create information cocoons, within which censorship and false information become imperceptible to those affected. Building on study insights, we propose novel platform-level interventions to enhance transparency and help users navigate information manipulation. In addition, we introduce the concept of plausibly deniable social platforms, enabling censored users to provide credible, benign explanations for their activities, protecting them from surveillance and coercion.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7a7462ca-bda2-4dad-a5be-df2c4dd24312Builds on26
- Effects of Credibility Indicators on Social Media News Sharing IntentWaheeb Yaqub, Otari Kakhidze, Morgan L. Brockman, Nasir D. Memon et al.CHI 2020 · 170 citations
- Global Measurement of DNS ManipulationPaul Pearce, Ben Jones, Frank Li, Roya Ensafi et al.USENIX Security 2017 · 163 citations
- Birds of a feather don't fact-check each other: Partisanship and the evaluation of news in Twitter's Birdwatch crowdsourced fact-checking programJennifer Allen, Cameron Martel, David G. RandCHI 2022 · 104 citations
- Countering Fake News: A Comparison of Possible Solutions Regarding User Acceptance and EffectivenessJan Kirchner, Christian ReuterCSCW 2020 · 89 citations
- SoK: Towards Grounding Censorship Circumvention in EmpiricismMichael Carl Tschantz, Sadia Afroz, anonymous, Vern PaxsonS&P 2016 · 89 citations
Related papers
- Strategies and Vulnerabilities of Participants in Venezuelan Influence OperationsRuben Recabarren, Bogdan Carbunar, Nestor Hernandez, Ashfaq Ali ShafinUSENIX Security 2023
- The Government's Dividend: Complex Perceptions of Social Media Misinformation in ChinaZhicong Lu, Yue Jiang, Cheng Lu, Mor Naaman et al.CHI 2020 · 34 citations
- Bridging Barriers: A Survey of Challenges and Priorities in the Censorship Circumvention LandscapeDiwen Xue, Anna Ablove, Reethika Ramesh, Grace Kwak Danciu et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 7 citations
- Others Are to Blame: Whom People Consider Responsible for Online MisinformationGabriel Lima, Jiyoung Han, Meeyoung ChaCSCW 2022 · 17 citations
- Combating Misinformation in Bangladesh: Roles and Responsibilities as Perceived by Journalists, Fact-checkers, and UsersMd Mahfuzul Haque, Mohammad Yousuf, Ahmed Shatil Alam, Pratyasha Saha et al.CSCW 2020 · 84 citations
