Auction Learning as a Two-Player Game
Jad Rahme, Samy Jelassi, S. Matthew Weinberg
Abstract
Designing an incentive compatible auction that maximizes expected revenue is a central problem in Auction Design. While theoretical approaches to the problem have hit some limits, a recent research direction initiated by Duetting et al. (2019) consists in building neural network architectures to find optimal auctions. We propose two conceptual deviations from their approach which result in enhanced performance. First, we use recent results in theoretical auction design (Rubinstein and Weinberg, 2018) to introduce a time-independent Lagrangian. This not only circumvents the need for an expensive hyper-parameter search (as in prior work), but also provides a principled metric to compare the performance of two auctions (absent from prior work). Second, the optimization procedure in previous work uses an inner maximization loop to compute optimal misreports. We amortize this process through the introduction of an additional neural network. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach by learning competitive or strictly improved auctions compared to prior work. Both results together further imply a novel formulation of Auction Design as a two-player game with stationary utility functions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 79d53c5d-6426-442e-8c61-ff23338a67baCited by top-tier papers17
- Optimal-er Auctions through AttentionDmitry Ivanov, Iskander Safiulin, Igor Filippov, Ksenia BalabaevaNeurIPS 2022 · 57 citations
- A Scalable Neural Network for DSIC Affine Maximizer Auction DesignZhijian Duan, Haoran Sun, Yurong Chen, Xiaotie DengNeurIPS 2023 · 54 citations
- A Context-Integrated Transformer-Based Neural Network for Auction DesignZhijian Duan, Jingwu Tang, Yutong Yin, Zhe Feng et al.ICML 2022 · 46 citations
- PreferenceNet: Encoding Human Preferences in Auction Design with Deep LearningNeehar Peri, Michael J. Curry, Samuel Dooley, John DickersonNeurIPS 2021 · 46 citations
- On the Convergence of No-Regret Learning Dynamics in Time-Varying GamesIoannis Anagnostides, Ioannis Panageas, Gabriele Farina, Tuomas SandholmNeurIPS 2023 · 27 citations
Builds on2
- A Permutation-Equivariant Neural Network Architecture For Auction DesignJad Rahme, Samy Jelassi, Joan Bruna, S. Matthew WeinbergAAAI 2021 · 65 citations
- An Efficient ∊-BIC to BIC Transformation and Its Application to Black-Box Reduction in Revenue MaximizationYang Cai, Argyris Oikonomou, Grigoris Velegkas, Mingfei ZhaoSODA 2021 · 10 citations
Related papers
- Benefits of Permutation-Equivariance in Auction MechanismsTian Qin, Fengxiang He, Dingfeng Shi, Wenbing Huang et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 13 citations
- Mode Connectivity in Auction DesignChristoph Hertrich, Yixin Tao, László A. VéghNeurIPS 2023 · 6 citations
- Certifying Strategyproof Auction NetworksMichael J. Curry, Ping-Yeh Chiang, Tom Goldstein, John DickersonNeurIPS 2020 · 37 citations
- Learning Optimal Auctions with Correlated Value DistributionsDa Huo, Zhenzhe Zheng, Fan WuAAAI 2025 · 4 citations
- Simultaneous Optimization of Bid Shading and Internal Auction for Demand-Side PlatformsYadong Xu, Bonan Ni, Weiran Shen, Xun Wang et al.AAAI 2024 · 1 citation
