APRIL: Finding the Achilles' Heel on Privacy for Vision Transformers
Jiahao Lu, Xi Sheryl Zhang, Tianli Zhao, Xiangyu He, Jian Cheng
Abstract
Federated learning frameworks typically require collaborators to share their local gradient updates of a common model instead of sharing training data to preserve privacy. However, prior works on Gradient Leakage Attacks showed that private training data can be revealed from gradients. So far almost all relevant works base their attacks on fully-connected or convolutional neural networks. Given the recent overwhelmingly rising trend of adapting Transformers to solve multifarious vision tasks, it is highly valuable to investigate the privacy risk of vision transformers. In this paper, we analyse the gradient leakage risk of self-attention based mechanism in both theoretical and practical manners. Particularly, we propose APRIL - Attention PRIvacy Leakage, which poses a strong threat to self-attention inspired models such as ViT. Showing how vision Transformers are at the risk of privacy leakage via gradients, we urge the significance of designing privacy-safer Transformer models and defending schemes.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7990ecaa-3f5f-4f33-be6b-3548ce3b40bfCited by top-tier papers13
- DAGER: Exact Gradient Inversion for Large Language ModelsIvo Petrov, Dimitar I. Dimitrov, Maximilian Baader, Mark Niklas Müller et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 29 citations
- Dropout Is NOT All You Need to Prevent Gradient LeakageDaniel Scheliga, Patrick Maeder, Marco SeelandAAAI 2023 · 22 citations
- Uncovering Gradient Inversion Risks in Practical Language Model TrainingXinguo Feng, Zhongkui Ma, Zihan Wang, Eu Joe Chegne et al.CCS 2024 · 2 citations
- Enhancing Privacy Preservation in Federated Learning via Learning Rate PerturbationGuangnian Wan, Haitao Du, Xuejing Yuan, Jun Yang et al.ICCV 2023 · 2 citations
- How Does a Deep Learning Model Architecture Impact Its Privacy? A Comprehensive Study of Privacy Attacks on CNNs and TransformersGuangsheng Zhang, Bo Liu, Huan Tian, Tianqing Zhu et al.USENIX Security 2024
Builds on19
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted WindowsZe Liu, Yutong Lin, Yue Cao, Han Hu et al.ICCV 2021 · 31,683 citations
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- SegFormer: Simple and Efficient Design for Semantic Segmentation with TransformersEnze Xie, Wenhai Wang, Zhiding Yu, Anima Anandkumar et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 9,661 citations
- Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentionHugo Touvron, Matthieu Cord, Matthijs Douze, Francisco Massa et al.ICML 2021 · 8,974 citations
Related papers
- Membership Inference Attacks against Vision Transformers: Mosaic MixUp Training to the DefenseQiankun Zhang, Di Yuan, Boyu Zhang, Bin Yuan et al.CCS 2024 · 1 citation
- Generating Transferable Adversarial Examples against Vision TransformersYuxuan Wang, Jiakai Wang, Zixin Yin, Ruihao Gong et al.ACM MM 2022 · 25 citations
- GradViT: Gradient Inversion of Vision TransformersAli Hatamizadeh, Hongxu Yin, Holger Roth, Wenqi Li et al.CVPR 2022 · 67 citations
- Decepticons: Corrupted Transformers Breach Privacy in Federated Learning for Language ModelsLiam H. Fowl, Jonas Geiping, Steven Reich, Yuxin Wen et al.ICLR 2023 · 10 citations
- Attention-Imperceptible Backdoor Attacks on Vision TransformersZhishen Wang, Rui Wang, Lihua JingAAAI 2025 · 5 citations
