Evaluation of Test-Time Adaptation Under Computational Time Constraints
Motasem Alfarra, Hani Itani, Alejandro Pardo, Shyma Alhuwaider, Merey Ramazanova, Juan Camilo Pérez, Zhipeng Cai, Matthias Müller, Bernard Ghanem
Abstract
This paper proposes a novel online evaluation protocol for Test Time Adaptation (TTA) methods, which penalizes slower methods by providing them with fewer samples for adaptation. TTA methods leverage unlabeled data at test time to adapt to distribution shifts. Although many effective methods have been proposed, their impressive performance usually comes at the cost of significantly increased computation budgets. Current evaluation protocols overlook the effect of this extra computation cost, affecting their real-world applicability. To address this issue, we propose a more realistic evaluation protocol for TTA methods, where data is received in an online fashion from a constant-speed data stream, thereby accounting for the method's adaptation speed. We apply our proposed protocol to benchmark several TTA methods on multiple datasets and scenarios. Extensive experiments show that, when accounting for inference speed, simple and fast approaches can outperform more sophisticated but slower methods. For example, SHOT from 2020, outperforms the state-of-the-art method SAR from 2023 in this setting. Our results reveal the importance of developing practical TTA methods that are both accurate and efficient 1 .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers6
- SNAP: Low-Latency Test-Time Adaptation with Sparse UpdatesHyeongheon Cha, Dong Min Kim, Hye Won Chung, Taesik Gong et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- Tempora: Characterising the Time-Contingent Utility of Online Test-Time AdaptationSudarshan Sreeram, Young D. Kwon, Cecilia MascoloICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Beyond Entropy: Region Confidence Proxy for Wild Test-Time AdaptationZixuan Hu, Yichun Hu, Xiaotong Li, Shixiang Tang et al.ICML 2025
- Turning Adaptation into Assets: Cross-Domain Bridging for Online Vision-Language NavigationZixuan Hu, Xuantuo Huang, Yancheng Li, Yichun Hu et al.ICML 2026
- Ranked Entropy Minimization for Continual Test-Time AdaptationJisu Han, Jaemin Na, Wonjun HwangICML 2025
Builds on24
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution GeneralizationDan Hendrycks, Steven Basart, Norman Mu, Saurav Kadavath et al.ICCV 2021 · 2,294 citations
- Tent: Fully Test-Time Adaptation by Entropy MinimizationDequan Wang, Evan Shelhamer, Shaoteng Liu, Bruno A. Olshausen et al.ICLR 2021 · 1,731 citations
- Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain AdaptationJian Liang, Dapeng Hu, Jiashi FengICML 2020 · 1,624 citations
Related papers
- On Pitfalls of Test-Time AdaptationHao Zhao, Yuejiang Liu, Alexandre Alahi, Tao LinICML 2023 · 72 citations
- Backpropagation-Free Test-Time Adaptation via Probabilistic Gaussian AlignmentYoujia Zhang, Youngeun Kim, Young-Geun Choi, Hongyeob Kim et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 10 citations
- Towards Stable Test-time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild WorldShuaicheng Niu, Jiaxiang Wu, Yifan Zhang, Zhiquan Wen et al.ICLR 2023 · 62 citations
- Test-Time Training with Self-Supervision for Generalization under Distribution ShiftsYu Sun, Xiaolong Wang, Zhuang Liu, John Miller et al.ICML 2020 · 1,220 citations
- SoTTA: Robust Test-Time Adaptation on Noisy Data StreamsTaesik Gong, Yewon Kim, Taeckyung Lee, Sorn Chottananurak et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 89 citations
