EAGer: Entropy-Aware GEneRation for Adaptive Inference-Time Scaling
Daniel Scalena, Leonidas Zotos, Elisabetta Fersini, Malvina Nissim, Ahmet Üstün
Abstract
With the rise of reasoning language models and test-time scaling methods as a paradigm for improving model performance, substantial computation is often required to generate multiple candidate sequences from the same prompt. This enables exploration of different reasoning paths toward the correct solution, however, allocates the same compute budget for each prompt. Grounded on the assumption that different prompts carry different degrees of complexity, and thus different computation needs, we propose EAGer, a training-free generation method that leverages model uncertainty through token-wise entropy distribution to reduce redundant computation and concurrently improve overall performance. EAGer allows branching to multiple reasoning paths only in the presence of high-entropy tokens, and reallocates the saved compute budget to instances where exploration of alternative paths is most needed. We validate EAGer across multiple open-source models on complex reasoning benchmarks, with gains specifically demonstrated on AIME 2025. When target labels are accessible -- as in RLVR training pipelines -- EAGer achieves up to +37% in Pass@k and 59% fewer tokens; in test-time settings it still yields +12% in Pass@k and 64% fewer tokens compared to Full Parallel Sampling.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 78f176ef-85e5-47d6-a307-e632fe1db426Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on12
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
- Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code GenerationJiawei Liu, Chunqiu Steven Xia, Yuyao Wang, Lingming ZhangNeurIPS 2023 · 2,317 citations
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le et al.ICLR 2023 · 681 citations
- Beyond the 80/20 Rule: High-Entropy Minority Tokens Drive Effective Reinforcement Learning for LLM ReasoningShenzhi Wang, Le Yu, Chang Gao, Chujie Zheng et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 592 citations
Related papers
- MUR: Momentum Uncertainty guided Reasoning for Large Language ModelsHang Yan, Fangzhi Xu, Rongman Xu, Yifei Li et al.ACL 2026 · 12 citations
- Less is More: Improving LLM Reasoning with Minimal Test-Time InterventionZhen Yang, Mingyang Zhang, Feng Chen, Ganggui Ding et al.ACL 2026
- Stop When Further Reasoning Won’t Help: Attention-State Adaptive Generation in Reasoning ModelsJiakai Li, KE QIN, Rongzheng Wang, Yizhuo Ma et al.ICML 2026
- Reasoning Path Compression: Compressing Generation Trajectories for Efficient LLM ReasoningJiwon Song, Dongwon Jo, Yulhwa Kim, Jae-Joon KimNeurIPS 2025 · 25 citations
- Accelerated Test-Time Scaling with Model-Free Speculative SamplingWoomin Song, Saket Dingliwal, Sai Muralidhar Jayanthi, Bhavana Ganesh et al.EMNLP 2025
