BRIO: Bringing Order to Abstractive Summarization
Yixin Liu, Pengfei Liu, Dragomir R. Radev, Graham Neubig
Abstract
Abstractive summarization models are commonly trained using maximum likelihood estimation, which assumes a deterministic (onepoint) target distribution in which an ideal model will assign all the probability mass to the reference summary. This assumption may lead to performance degradation during inference, where the model needs to compare several system-generated (candidate) summaries that have deviated from the reference summary. To address this problem, we propose a novel training paradigm which assumes a non-deterministic distribution so that different candidate summaries are assigned probability mass according to their quality. Our method achieves a new state-of-the-art result on the CNN/DailyMail (47.78 ROUGE-1) and XSum (49.07 ROUGE-1) datasets. Further analysis also shows that our model can estimate probabilities of candidate summaries that are more correlated with their level of quality. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 78ca2cd7-bbe9-4876-a6f1-a86040ad0a64Cited by top-tier papers47
- RRHF: Rank Responses to Align Language Models with Human FeedbackHongyi Yuan, Zheng Yuan, Chuanqi Tan, Wei Wang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 515 citations
- Lift Yourself Up: Retrieval-augmented Text Generation with Self-MemoryXin Cheng, Di Luo, Xiuying Chen, Lemao Liu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 177 citations
- Knowledge Card: Filling LLMs' Knowledge Gaps with Plug-in Specialized Language ModelsShangbin Feng, Weijia Shi, Yuyang Bai, Vidhisha Balachandran et al.ICLR 2024 · 56 citations
- Revisiting the Gold Standard: Grounding Summarization Evaluation with Robust Human EvaluationYixin Liu, Alexander R. Fabbri, Pengfei Liu, Yilun Zhao et al.ACL 2023 · 50 citations
- Aligning Language Models with Human Preferences via a Bayesian ApproachJiashuo Wang, Haozhao Wang, Shichao Sun, Wenjie LiNeurIPS 2023 · 42 citations
Builds on14
- A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual RepresentationsTing Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Geoffrey E. HintonICML 2020 · 24,064 citations
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- PEGASUS: Pre-training with Extracted Gap-sentences for Abstractive SummarizationJingqing Zhang, Yao Zhao, Mohammad Saleh, Peter J. LiuICML 2020 · 2,453 citations
- BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and ComprehensionMike Lewis, Yinhan Liu, Naman Goyal, Marjan Ghazvininejad et al.ACL 2020 · 1,224 citations
- BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text GenerationWeizhe Yuan, Graham Neubig, Pengfei LiuNeurIPS 2021 · 1,143 citations
Related papers
- Learning with Rejection for Abstractive Text SummarizationMeng Cao, Yue Dong, Jingyi He, Jackie Chi Kit CheungEMNLP 2022 · 10 citations
- On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive SummarizationJoshua Maynez, Shashi Narayan, Bernd Bohnet, Ryan T. McDonaldACL 2020 · 54 citations
- SummaReranker: A Multi-Task Mixture-of-Experts Re-ranking Framework for Abstractive SummarizationMathieu Ravaut, Shafiq R. Joty, Nancy F. ChenACL 2022 · 116 citations
- CLIFF: Contrastive Learning for Improving Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive SummarizationShuyang Cao, Lu WangEMNLP 2021 · 130 citations
- Extractive Summarization as Text MatchingMing Zhong, Pengfei Liu, Yiran Chen, Danqing Wang et al.ACL 2020 · 410 citations
