Fine-tuning Partition-aware Item Similarities for Efficient and Scalable Recommendation
Tianjun Wei, Jianghong Ma, Tommy W. S. Chow
Abstract
Collaborative filtering (CF) is widely searched in recommendation with various types of solutions. Recent success of Graph Convolution Networks (GCN) in CF demonstrates the effectiveness of modeling high-order relationships through graphs, while repetitive graph convolution and iterative batch optimization limit their efficiency. Instead, item similarity models attempt to construct direct relationships through efficient interaction encoding. Despite their great performance, the growing item numbers result in quadratic growth in similarity modeling process, posing critical scalability problems. In this paper, we investigate the graph sampling strategy adopted in latest GCN model for efficiency improving, and identify the potential item group structure in the sampled graph. Based on this, we propose a novel item similarity model which introduces graph partitioning to restrict the item similarity modeling within each partition. Specifically, we show that the spectral information of the original graph is well in preserving global-level information. Then, it is added to fine-tune local item similarities with a new data augmentation strategy acted as partition-aware prior knowledge, jointly to cope with the information loss brought by partitioning. Experiments carried out on 4 datasets show that the proposed model outperforms state-of-the-art GCN models with 10x speed-up and item similarity models with 95% parameter storage savings. CCS CONCEPTS • Information systems → Recommender systems; Collaborative filtering.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 78a19cb1-575b-4546-87dd-1e09edaf63e4Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on7
- Are Graph Augmentations Necessary?: Simple Graph Contrastive Learning for RecommendationJunliang Yu, Hongzhi Yin, Xin Xia, Tong Chen et al.SIGIR 2022 · 658 citations
- Disentangled Graph Collaborative FilteringXiang Wang, Hongye Jin, An Zhang, Xiangnan He et al.SIGIR 2020 · 621 citations
- Improving Graph Collaborative Filtering with Neighborhood-enriched Contrastive LearningZihan Lin, Changxin Tian, Yupeng Hou, Wayne Xin ZhaoWWW 2022 · 606 citations
- Interest-aware Message-Passing GCN for RecommendationFan Liu, Zhiyong Cheng, Lei Zhu, Zan Gao et al.WWW 2021 · 325 citations
- Autoencoders that don't overfit towards the IdentityHarald SteckNeurIPS 2020 · 72 citations
Related papers
- Revisiting Graph Based Collaborative Filtering: A Linear Residual Graph Convolutional Network ApproachLei Chen, Le Wu, Richang Hong, Kun Zhang et al.AAAI 2020 · 634 citations
- Less is More: Reweighting Important Spectral Graph Features for RecommendationShaowen Peng, Kazunari Sugiyama, Tsunenori MineSIGIR 2022 · 44 citations
- Path-Enhanced Contrastive Learning for RecommendationHaoran Sun, Fei Xiong, Yuanzhe Hu, Liang WangNeurIPS 2025
- Graph-less Collaborative FilteringLianghao Xia, Chao Huang, Jiao Shi, Yong XuWWW 2023 · 60 citations
- On Manipulating Signals of User-Item Graph: A Jacobi Polynomial-based Graph Collaborative FilteringJiayan Guo, Lun Du, Xu Chen, Xiaojun Ma et al.KDD 2023 · 21 citations
