Adversarial Robustness against Multiple and Single lp-Threat Models via Quick Fine-Tuning of Robust Classifiers
Francesco Croce, Matthias Hein
Abstract
A major drawback of adversarially robust models, in particular for large scale datasets like ImageNet, is the extremely long training time compared to standard ones. Moreover, models should be robust not only to one -threat model but ideally to all of them. In this paper we propose Extreme norm Adversarial Training (E-AT) for multiple-norm robustness which is based on geometric properties of -balls. E-AT costs up to three times less than other adversarial training methods for multiple-norm robustness. Using E-AT we show that for ImageNet a single epoch and for CIFAR-10 three epochs are sufficient to turn any -robust model into a multiple-norm robust model. In this way we get the first multiple-norm robust model for ImageNet and boost the state-of-the-art for multiple-norm robustness to more than on CIFAR-10. Finally, we study the general transfer via fine-tuning of adversarial robustness between different individual -threat models and improve the previous SOTA -robustness on both CIFAR-10 and ImageNet. Extensive experiments show that our scheme works across datasets and architectures including vision transformers.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7898f62c-5403-4205-97b2-f4fffe9fcd14Cited by top-tier papers10
- Revisiting Adversarial Training for ImageNet: Architectures, Training and Generalization across Threat ModelsNaman Deep Singh, Francesco Croce, Matthias HeinNeurIPS 2023 · 119 citations
- LION: Implicit Vision Prompt TuningHaixin Wang, Jianlong Chang, Yihang Zhai, Xiao Luo et al.AAAI 2024 · 38 citations
- OODRobustBench: a Benchmark and Large-Scale Analysis of Adversarial Robustness under Distribution ShiftLin Li, Yifei Wang, Chawin Sitawarin, Michael W. SpratlingICML 2024 · 13 citations
- Mitigating Feature Gap for Adversarial Robustness by Feature DisentanglementNuoyan Zhou, Dawei Zhou, Decheng Liu, Nannan Wang et al.AAAI 2025 · 3 citations
- Exploring Geometry of Blind Spots in Vision modelsSriram Balasubramanian, Gaurang Sriramanan, Vinu Sankar Sadasivan, Soheil FeiziNeurIPS 2023 · 2 citations
Builds on23
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentionHugo Touvron, Matthieu Cord, Matthijs Douze, Francisco Massa et al.ICML 2021 · 8,974 citations
- Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacksFrancesco Croce, Matthias HeinICML 2020 · 2,337 citations
- CoAtNet: Marrying Convolution and Attention for All Data SizesZihang Dai, Hanxiao Liu, Quoc V. Le, Mingxing TanNeurIPS 2021 · 1,747 citations
- On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example DefensesFlorian Tramèr, Nicholas Carlini, Wieland Brendel, Aleksander MadryNeurIPS 2020 · 1,026 citations
Related papers
- RAMP: Boosting Adversarial Robustness Against Multiple lp Perturbations for Universal RobustnessEnyi Jiang, Gagandeep SinghNeurIPS 2024
- Seasoning Model Soups for Robustness to Adversarial and Natural Distribution ShiftsFrancesco Croce, Sylvestre-Alvise Rebuffi, Evan Shelhamer, Sven GowalCVPR 2023
- Confidence-Calibrated Adversarial Training: Generalizing to Unseen AttacksDavid Stutz, Matthias Hein, Bernt SchieleICML 2020 · 158 citations
- Perceptual Adversarial Robustness: Defense Against Unseen Threat ModelsCassidy Laidlaw, Sahil Singla, Soheil FeiziICLR 2021 · 217 citations
- Exploring the Relationship Between Architectural Design and Adversarially Robust GeneralizationAishan Liu, Shiyu Tang, Siyuan Liang, Ruihao Gong et al.CVPR 2023
