IPQA: A Benchmark for Core Intent Identification in Personalized Question Answering
Jieyong Kim, Maryam Amirizaniani, Soojin Yoon, Dongha Lee
Abstract
Intent identification serves as the foundation for generating appropriate responses in personalized question answering (PQA). However, existing benchmarks evaluate only response quality or retrieval performance without directly measuring intent identification capabilities. This gap is critical because without understanding which intents users prioritize, systems cannot generate responses satisfying individual information needs. To address this, we introduce the concept of core intents: intents users prioritize when selecting answers to satisfy their information needs. To evaluate these core intents, we propose IPQA, a benchmark for core Intent identification in Personalized Question Answering. Since users do not explicitly state their prioritized intents, we derive core intents from observable behavior patterns in answer selection, grounded in bounded rationality, where users satisfice by choosing answers meeting their acceptance thresholds. We construct a dataset with various domains through systematic filtering, LLM-based annotation, and rigorous quality control combining automated verification with human validation. Experimental evaluations across state-ofthe-art language models reveal that current systems struggle with core intent identification in personalized contexts. Models fail to identify core intents from user histories, with performance degrading as question complexity increases. [REPOSITORY]
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7874736a-3055-4c1d-8aa9-d6a6fe7395f4Builds on10
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentionWoosuk Kwon, Zhuohan Li, Siyuan Zhuang, Ying Sheng et al.SOSP 2023 · 1,016 citations
- G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using Gpt-4 with Better Human AlignmentYang Liu, Dan Iter, Yichong Xu, Shuohang Wang et al.EMNLP 2023 · 549 citations
- Deep Open Intent Classification with Adaptive Decision BoundaryHanlei Zhang, Hua Xu, Ting-En LinAAAI 2021 · 127 citations
- Review-driven Personalized Preference Reasoning with Large Language Models for RecommendationJieyong Kim, Hyunseo Kim, Hyunjin Cho, SeongKu Kang et al.SIGIR 2025 · 13 citations
Related papers
- LaMP-QA: A Benchmark for Personalized Long-form Question AnsweringAlireza Salemi, Hamed ZamaniEMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- Beyond Facts: Evaluating Intent Hallucination in Large Language ModelsYijie Hao, Haofei Yu, Jiaxuan YouACL 2025
- Pathways of Thoughts: Multi-Directional Thinking for Long-form Personalized Question AnsweringAlireza Salemi, Cheng Li, Mingyang Zhang, Qiaozhu Mei et al.WWW 2026 · 3 citations
- A User-Centric Multi-Intent Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language ModelsJiayin Wang, Fengran Mo, Weizhi Ma, Peijie Sun et al.EMNLP 2024 · 10 citations
- Persona2Web: Benchmarking Personalized Web Agents for Contextual Reasoning with User HistorySerin Kim, Sangam Lee, Dongha LeeICML 2026
