Lune

EMNLP Findings2025

A Group Fairness Lens for Large Language Models

Guanqun Bi, Yuqiang Xie, Lei Shen, Yanan Cao

Abstract

The need to assess LLMs for bias and fairness is critical, with current evaluations often being narrow, missing a broad categorical view. In this paper, we propose evaluating the bias and fairness of LLMs from a group fairness lens using a novel hierarchical schema characterizing diverse social groups. Specifically, we construct a dataset, GFAIR, encapsulating target-attribute combinations across multiple dimensions. Moreover, we introduce statement organization, a new open-ended text generation task, to uncover complex biases in LLMs. Extensive evaluations of popular LLMs reveal inherent safety concerns. To mitigate the biases of LLMs from a group fairness perspective, we pioneer a novel chainof-thought method GF-THINK to mitigate biases of LLMs from a group fairness perspective. Experimental results demonstrate its efficacy in mitigating bias and achieving fairness in LLMs. Our dataset and codes are available at https://github.com/surika/ Group-Fairness-LLMs.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · 1 top-tier paper that cites it · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Cited by top-tier papers1

  1. Bias Association Discovery Framework for Open-Ended LLM GenerationsJinhao Pan, Chahat Raj, Ziwei ZhuAAAI 2026 · 1 citation

Builds on24

  1. Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
  2. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
  3. Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
  4. Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu et al.ICLR 2022 · 4,966 citations
  5. RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language ModelsSamuel Gehman, Suchin Gururangan, Maarten Sap, Yejin Choi et al.EMNLP Findings 2020 · 692 citations

Related papers

  1. FairMT-Bench: Benchmarking Fairness for Multi-turn Dialogue in Conversational LLMsZhiting Fan, Ruizhe Chen, Tianxiang Hu, Zuozhu LiuICLR 2025
  2. The Impossibility of Fair LLMsJacy Reese Anthis, Kristian Lum, Michael D. Ekstrand, Avi Feller et al.ACL 2025
  3. Large Language Models Still Exhibit Bias in Long TextWonje Jeung, Dongjae Jeon, Ashkan Yousefpour, Jonghyun ChoiACL Findings 2025 · 2 citations
  4. Fairness Testing of Large Language Models in Role-PlayingXinyue Li, Zhenpeng Chen, Jie M. Zhang, Ying Xiao et al.FSE 2026 · 5 citations
  5. Cognitive Bias in Decision-Making with LLMsJessica Maria Echterhoff, Yao Liu, Abeer Alessa, Julian J. McAuley et al.EMNLP Findings 2024 · 62 citations
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines