Escaping Policy Contraction: Contraction-Aware PPO (CaPPO) for Stable Language Model Fine-Tuning
Dun Yuan, Di Wu, Xue Liu
Abstract
Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) with proximal policy optimization (PPO) is widely used but often yields less diverse outputs than supervised fine-tuning, suggesting an effect in which the policy’s support contracts during on-policy optimization. We formalize this “policy contraction” with the Support Retention Ratio (SRR)—the share of SFT completions that retain non-negligible probability under the RL policy—and additionally track token-entropy, Kullback–Leibler (KL) divergence to the reference, and repetition. We propose Contraction-Aware PPO (CaPPO), a minimum-norm multi-gradient update that co-optimizes reward, entropy, and KL, paired with a controller that steers exploration toward a target token entropy. On HH-RLHF, Summarize-from-Feedback, and UltraFeedback with Qwen2-7B, Qwen2.5-14B, Mistral-7B-Instruct, and Llama-3-8B-Instruct, CaPPO increases win rate by 2 to 4 points over PPO and improves diversity, gaining 0.2 to 0.3 higher SRR. The gains persist under decoding sweeps and are robust to reward scaling and critic variance. Treating reward, diversity, and stability as first-class objectives, CaPPO mitigates contraction without sacrificing alignment performance.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 77f7ea3e-b65c-4c1d-a80c-6866efd29442Builds on12
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
- Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic OptimizationKawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff, Dan Jurafsky et al.ICML 2024 · 973 citations
- RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI FeedbackHarrison Lee, Samrat Phatale, Hassan Mansoor, Thomas Mesnard et al.ICML 2024 · 598 citations
Related papers
- ReMax: A Simple, Effective, and Efficient Reinforcement Learning Method for Aligning Large Language ModelsZiniu Li, Tian Xu, Yushun Zhang, Zhihang Lin et al.ICML 2024 · 165 citations
- Back to Basics: Revisiting REINFORCE-Style Optimization for Learning from Human Feedback in LLMsArash Ahmadian, Chris Cremer, Matthias Gallé, Marzieh Fadaee et al.ACL 2024 · 20 citations
- Rethinking the Trust Region in LLM Reinforcement LearningPenghui Qi, Xiangxin Zhou, Zichen Liu, Tianyu Pang et al.ICML 2026 · 22 citations
- TGDPO: Harnessing Token-Level Reward Guidance for Enhancing Direct Preference OptimizationMingkang Zhu, Xi Chen, Zhongdao Wang, Bei Yu et al.ICML 2025
- OPPO: Accelerating PPO-based RLHF via Pipeline OverlapKaizhuo Yan, Yingjie Yu, Yifan Yu, Haizhong Zheng et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
