GLIME: General, Stable and Local LIME Explanation
Zeren Tan, Yang Tian, Jian Li
Abstract
As black-box machine learning models grow in complexity and find applications in high-stakes scenarios, it is imperative to provide explanations for their predictions. Although Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) [22] is a widely adpoted method for understanding model behaviors, it is unstable with respect to random seeds [35, 24, 3] and exhibits low local fidelity (i.e., how well the explanation approximates the model's local behaviors) [21, 16] . Our study shows that this instability problem stems from small sample weights, leading to the dominance of regularization and slow convergence. Additionally, LIME's sampling neighborhood is non-local and biased towards the reference, resulting in poor local fidelity and sensitivity to reference choice. To tackle these challenges, we introduce GLIME, an enhanced framework extending LIME and unifying several prior methods. Within the GLIME framework, we derive an equivalent formulation of LIME that achieves significantly faster convergence and improved stability. By employing a local and unbiased sampling distribution, GLIME generates explanations with higher local fidelity compared to LIME. GLIME explanations are independent of reference choice. Moreover, GLIME offers users the flexibility to choose a sampling distribution based on their specific scenarios.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 77a645c2-dc71-4e16-a2d0-3b301a1cdd88Cited by top-tier papers8
- Multi-Level Explanations for Generative Language ModelsLucas Monteiro Paes, Dennis Wei, Hyo Jin Do, Hendrik Strobelt et al.ACL 2025 · 16 citations
- ReX: A Framework for Incorporating Temporal Information in Model-Agnostic Local Explanation TechniquesJunhao Liu, Xin ZhangAAAI 2025 · 6 citations
- Minimizing False-Positive Attributions in Explanations of Non-Linear ModelsAnders Gjølbye, Stefan Haufe, Lars Kai HansenNeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- ABLE: Using Adversarial Pairs to Construct Local Models for Explaining Model PredictionsKrishna Khadka, Sunny Shree, Pujan Budhathoki, Yu Lei et al.KDD 2026
- Sparse and Faithful Local Explanations with Piecewise Linear SurrogatesYixin Wang, Yucheng DongICML 2026
Builds on5
- Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted WindowsZe Liu, Yutong Lin, Yue Cao, Han Hu et al.ICCV 2021 · 31,683 citations
- XRAI: Better Attributions Through RegionsAndrei Kapishnikov, Tolga Bolukbasi, Fernanda B. Viégas, Michael TerryICCV 2019 · 251 citations
- Which Explanation Should I Choose? A Function Approximation Perspective to Characterizing Post Hoc ExplanationsTessa Han, Suraj Srinivas, Himabindu LakkarajuNeurIPS 2022 · 126 citations
- What does LIME really see in images?Damien Garreau, Dina MardaouiICML 2021 · 49 citations
- Missingness Bias in Model DebuggingSaachi Jain, Hadi Salman, Eric Wong, Pengchuan Zhang et al.ICLR 2022 · 45 citations
Related papers
- Locally Invariant Explanations: Towards Stable and Unidirectional Explanations through Local Invariant LearningAmit Dhurandhar, Karthikeyan Natesan Ramamurthy, Kartik Ahuja, Vijay AryaNeurIPS 2023 · 7 citations
- Reliable Post hoc Explanations: Modeling Uncertainty in ExplainabilityDylan Slack, Anna Hilgard, Sameer Singh, Himabindu LakkarajuNeurIPS 2021 · 240 citations
- Is this the Right Neighborhood? Accurate and Query Efficient Model Agnostic ExplanationsAmit Dhurandhar, Karthikeyan Natesan Ramamurthy, Karthikeyan ShanmugamNeurIPS 2022 · 9 citations
- A Zest of LIME: Towards Architecture-Independent Model DistancesHengrui Jia, Hongyu Chen, Jonas Guan, Ali Shahin Shamsabadi et al.ICLR 2022 · 30 citations
- S-LIME: Stabilized-LIME for Model ExplanationZhengze Zhou, Giles Hooker, Fei WangKDD 2021 · 98 citations
