Describing Subjective Experiment Consistency by p-Value P-P Plot
Jakub Nawala, Lucjan Janowski, Bogdan Cmiel, Krzysztof Rusek
Abstract
There are phenomena that cannot be measured without subjective testing. However, subjective testing is a complex issue with many influencing factors. These interplay to yield either precise or incorrect results. Researchers require a tool to classify results of subjective experiment as either consistent or inconsistent. This is necessary in order to decide whether to treat the gathered scores as quality ground truth data. Knowing if subjective scores can be trusted is key to drawing valid conclusions and building functional tools based on those scores (e.g., algorithms assessing the perceived quality of multimedia materials). We provide a tool to classify subjective experiment (and all its results) as either consistent or inconsistent. Additionally, the tool identifies stimuli having irregular score distribution. The approach is based on treating subjective scores as a random variable coming from the discrete Generalized Score Distribution (GSD). The GSD, in combination with a bootstrapped G-test of goodness-of-fit, allows to construct p-value P--P plot that visualizes experiment's consistency. The tool safeguards researchers from using inconsistent subjective data. In this way, it makes sure that conclusions they draw and tools they build are more precise and trustworthy. The proposed approach works in line with expectations drawn solely on experiment design descriptions of 21 real-life multimedia quality subjective experiments.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7781fb49-e01f-4e5e-a778-338d0394475aRelated papers
- Bridging the Lab and the Wild: Behavioral Experiments as a Pathway to QoE Research Closer to Realistic EnvironmentDominika Wanat, Dawid Juszka, Mikolaj Leszczuk, Lucjan JanowskiACM MM 2025 · 1 citation
- A Probabilistic Graphical Model for Analyzing the Subjective Visual Quality Assessment Data from CrowdsourcingJing Li, Suiyi Ling, Junle Wang, Patrick Le CalletACM MM 2020 · 23 citations
- Statistical Multicriteria Benchmarking via the GSD-FrontChristoph Jansen, Georg Schollmeyer, Julian Rodemann, Hannah Blocher et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 15 citations
- CLIP-PCQA: Exploring Subjective-Aligned Vision-Language Modeling for Point Cloud Quality AssessmentYating Liu, Yujie Zhang, Ziyu Shan, Yiling XuAAAI 2025 · 9 citations
- Debiased Subjective Assessment of Real-World Image EnhancementPeibei Cao, Zhangyang Wang, Kede MaCVPR 2021
