Triplet Fingerprinting: More Practical and Portable Website Fingerprinting with N-shot Learning
Payap Sirinam, Nate Mathews, Mohammad Saidur Rahman, Matthew Wright
Abstract
Website Fingerprinting (WF) attacks pose a serious threat to users' online privacy, including for users of the Tor anonymity system. By exploiting recent advances in deep learning, WF attacks like Deep Fingerprinting (DF) have reached up to 98% accuracy. The DF attack, however, requires large amounts of training data that needs to be updated regularly, making it less practical for the weaker attacker model typically assumed in WF. Moreover, research on WF attacks has been criticized for not demonstrating attack effectiveness under more realistic and more challenging scenarios. Most research on WF attacks assumes that the testing and training data have similar distributions and are collected from the same type of network at about the same time. In this paper, we examine how an attacker could leverage N-shot learning---a machine learning technique requiring just a few training samples to identify a given class---to reduce the effort of gathering and training with a large WF dataset as well as mitigate the adverse effects of dealing with different network conditions. In particular, we propose a new WF attack called Triplet Fingerprinting (TF) that uses triplet networks for N-shot learning. We evaluate this attack in challenging settings such as where the training and testing data are collected multiple years apart on different networks, and we find that the TF attack remains effective in such settings with 85% accuracy or better. We also show that the TF attack is also effective in the open world and outperforms traditional transfer learning. On top of that, the attack requires only five examples to recognize a website, making it dangerous in a wide variety of scenarios where gathering and training on a complete dataset would be impractical.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 777e2687-d9ac-45d0-bd3a-3182422b6f32Cited by top-tier papers43
- Defeating DNN-Based Traffic Analysis Systems in Real-Time With Blind Adversarial PerturbationsMilad Nasr, Alireza Bahramali, Amir HoumansadrUSENIX Security 2021 · 142 citations
- TrafficSliver: Fighting Website Fingerprinting Attacks with Traffic SplittingWladimir De la Cadena, Asya Mitseva, Jens Hiller, Jan Pennekamp et al.CCS 2020 · 110 citations
- DeepCoFFEA: Improved Flow Correlation Attacks on Tor via Metric Learning and AmplificationSe Eun Oh, Taiji Yang, Nate Mathews, James K. Holland et al.S&P 2022 · 60 citations
- Realistic Website Fingerprinting By Augmenting Network TracesAlireza Bahramali, Ardavan Bozorgi, Amir HoumansadrCCS 2023 · 45 citations
- Exposing the Rat in the Tunnel: Using Traffic Analysis for Tor-based Malware DetectionPriyanka Dodia, Mashael AlSabah, Omar Alrawi, Tao WangCCS 2022 · 31 citations
Related papers
- Contrastive Fingerprinting: A Novel Website Fingerprinting Attack over Few-shot TracesYi Xie, Jiahao Feng, Wenju Huang, Yixi Zhang et al.WWW 2024 · 18 citations
- Online Website Fingerprinting: Evaluating Website Fingerprinting Attacks on Tor in the Real WorldGiovanni Cherubin, Rob Jansen, Carmela TroncosoUSENIX Security 2022
- Towards Practical Few-shot Multi-tab Website FingerprintingLin Liu, Ziling Wei, Zhuotao Liu, Xinhao Deng et al.USENIX Security 2026
- Beyond Single Tabs: A Transformative Few-Shot Approach to Multi-Tab Website Fingerprinting AttacksWenwen Meng, Chuan Ma, Ming Ding, Chunpeng Ge et al.WWW 2025 · 8 citations
- Deep Fingerprinting: Undermining Website Fingerprinting Defenses with Deep LearningPayap Sirinam, Mohsen Imani, Marc Juarez, Matthew WrightCCS 2018 · 632 citations
