Catching Transparent Phish: Analyzing and Detecting MITM Phishing Toolkits
Brian Kondracki, Babak Amin Azad, Oleksii Starov, Nick Nikiforakis
Abstract
For over a decade, phishing toolkits have been helping attackers automate and streamline their phishing campaigns. Man-in-the- Middle (MITM) phishing toolkits are the latest evolution in this space, where toolkits act as malicious reverse proxy servers of online services, mirroring live content to users while extracting cre- dentials and session cookies in transit. These tools further reduce the work required by attackers, automate the harvesting of 2FA- authenticated sessions, and substantially increase the believability of phishing web pages. In this paper, we present the first analysis of MITM phishing toolkits used in the wild. By analyzing and experimenting with these toolkits, we identify intrinsic network-level properties that can be used to identify them. Based on these properties, we develop a machine learning classifier that identifies the presence of such toolkits in online communications with 99.9% accuracy. We conduct a large-scale longitudinal study of MITM phishing toolkits by creating a data-collection framework that monitors and crawls suspicious URLs from public sources. Using this infrastruc- ture, we capture data on 1,220 MITM phishing websites over the course of a year. We discover that MITM phishing toolkits occupy a blind spot in phishing blocklists, with only 43.7% of domains and 18.9% of IP addresses associated with MITM phishing toolkits present on blocklists, leaving unsuspecting users vulnerable to these attacks. Our results show that our detection scheme is resilient to the cloaking mechanisms incorporated by these tools, and is able to detect previously hidden phishing content. Finally, we propose methods that online services can utilize to fingerprint requests origi- nating from these toolkits and stop phishing attempts as they occur.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 77678ca1-111f-422c-9810-9ae2a575a064Cited by top-tier papers10
- TxPhishScope: Towards Detecting and Understanding Transaction-based Phishing on EthereumBowen He, Yuan Chen, Zhuo Chen, Xiaohui Hu et al.CCS 2023 · 38 citations
- "Get in Researchers; We're Measuring Reproducibility": A Reproducibility Study of Machine Learning Papers in Tier 1 Security ConferencesDaniel Olszewski, Allison Lu, Carson Stillman, Kevin Warren et al.CCS 2023 · 19 citations
- The Poorest Man in Babylon: A Longitudinal Study of Cryptocurrency Investment ScamsMuhammad Muzammil, Abisheka Pitumpe, Xigao Li, Amir Rahmati et al.WWW 2025 · 13 citations
- SoK: State of the Krawlers - Evaluating the Effectiveness of Crawling Algorithms for Web Security MeasurementsAleksei Stafeev, Giancarlo PellegrinoUSENIX Security 2024 · 12 citations
- Phishing Vs. Legit: Comparative Analysis of Client-Side Resources of Phishing and Target Brand WebsitesKyungchan Lim, Jaehwan Park, Doowon KimWWW 2024 · 11 citations
Builds on9
- Data Breaches, Phishing, or Malware?: Understanding the Risks of Stolen CredentialsKurt Thomas, Frank Li, Ali Zand, Jacob Barrett et al.CCS 2017 · 248 citations
- Hiding in Plain Sight: A Longitudinal Study of Combosquatting AbusePanagiotis Kintis, Najmeh Miramirkhani, Charles Lever, Yizheng Chen et al.CCS 2017 · 166 citations
- PREDATOR: Proactive Recognition and Elimination of Domain Abuse at Time-Of-RegistrationShuang Hao, Alex Kantchelian, Brad Miller, Vern Paxson et al.CCS 2016 · 133 citations
- PhishFarm: A Scalable Framework for Measuring the Effectiveness of Evasion Techniques against Browser Phishing BlacklistsAdam Oest, Yeganeh Safaei, Adam Doupé, Gail-Joon Ahn et al.S&P 2019 · 129 citations
- PhishEye: Live Monitoring of Sandboxed Phishing KitsXiao Han, Nizar Kheir, Davide BalzarottiCCS 2016 · 118 citations
Related papers
- Catching Phishers By Their Bait: Investigating the Dutch Phishing Landscape through Phishing Kit DetectionHugo L. J. Bijmans, Tim M. Booij, Anneke Schwedersky, Aria Nedgabat et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 61 citations
- I'm SPARTACUS, No, I'm SPARTACUS: Proactively Protecting Users from Phishing by Intentionally Triggering Cloaking BehaviorPenghui Zhang, Zhibo Sun, Sukwha Kyung, Hans Walter Behrens et al.CCS 2022 · 18 citations
- SoK: PHILTER: Uncovering Security and Functional Gaps in AI-based Phishing Website Detection Literature via an LLM-based Reasoning FrameworkMahbub Alam, Muhammad Lutfor Rahman, Sonjoy Kumar Paul, Amy W. Hays et al.USENIX Security 2026
- What's in Phishers: A Longitudinal Study of Security Configurations in Phishing Websites and KitsKyungchan Lim, Kiho Lee, Fujiao Ji, Yonghwi Kwon et al.WWW 2025 · 3 citations
- PhishDecloaker: Detecting CAPTCHA-cloaked Phishing Websites via Hybrid Vision-based Interactive ModelsXiwen Teoh, Yun Lin, Ruofan Liu, Zhiyong Huang et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 13 citations
