Binary Classifier Optimization for Large Language Model Alignment
Seungjae Jung, Gunsoo Han, Daniel Wontae Nam, Kyoung-Woon On
Abstract
In real-world services such as ChatGPT, aligning models based on user feedback is crucial for improving model performance. However, due to the simplicity and convenience of providing feedback, users typically offer only basic binary signals, such as 'thumbs-up' or 'thumbsdown'. Most existing alignment research, on the other hand, relies on preference-based approaches that require both positive and negative responses as a pair. We propose Binary Classifier Optimization (BCO), a technique that effectively aligns LLMs using only binary feedback. BCO trains a binary classifier, where the logit serves as an implicit reward, effectively minimizing the Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) loss. We demonstrate that the binary cross-entropy loss employed in classifier training acts as an upper bound for the DPO loss. Additionally, a novel reward shift technique further minimizes the gap between the losses. We validate our methodology in two settings: first, on a paired preference dataset, where our method performs on par with DPO; and second, on a Likert-5 scale annotation dataset which stems from real users' queries. Our model consistently demonstrates effective and robust alignment across four base LLMs and three different datasets, showcasing the strength of our approach to learning from binary signals.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers16
- Co-rewarding: Stable Self-supervised RL for Eliciting Reasoning in Large Language ModelsZizhuo Zhang, Jianing Zhu, Xinmu Ge, Zihua Zhao et al.ICLR 2026 · 16 citations
- Not Everything is All You Need: Toward Low-Redundant Optimization for Large Language Model AlignmentZhipeng Chen, Kun Zhou, Xin Zhao, Jingyuan Wang et al.EMNLP 2024 · 7 citations
- Proximalized Preference Optimization for Diverse Feedback Types: A Decomposed Perspective on DPOKaiyang Guo, Yinchuan Li, Zhitang ChenNeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
- DavIR: Data Selection via Implicit Reward for Large Language ModelsHaotian Zhou, Tingkai Liu, Qianli Ma, Yufeng Zhang et al.ACL 2025 · 7 citations
- LLM Safety Alignment is Divergence Estimation in DisguiseRajdeep Haldar, Ziyi Wang, Guang Lin, Yue Xing et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
Builds on9
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- FlashAttention-2: Faster Attention with Better Parallelism and Work PartitioningTri DaoICLR 2024 · 2,600 citations
- Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic OptimizationKawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff, Dan Jurafsky et al.ICML 2024 · 973 citations
- Self-Rewarding Language ModelsWeizhe Yuan, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Kyunghyun Cho, Xian Li et al.ICML 2024 · 569 citations
Related papers
- Geometric-Averaged Preference Optimization for Soft Preference LabelsHiroki Furuta, Kuang-Huei Lee, Shixiang Shane Gu, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 24 citations
- Cal-DPO: Calibrated Direct Preference Optimization for Language Model AlignmentTeng Xiao, Yige Yuan, Huaisheng Zhu, Mingxiao Li et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 76 citations
- Private Direct Preference Optimization for LLM AlignmentYangfan Jiang, Fei Wei, Ergute Bao, Xiaokui Xiao et al.CCS 2026
- TODO: Enhancing LLM Alignment with Ternary PreferencesYuxiang Guo, Lu Yin, Bo Jiang, Jiaqi ZhangICLR 2025
- What Matters in Data for DPO?Yu Pan, Zhongze Cai, Huaiyang Zhong, Guanting Chen et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 13 citations
