Rethinking Explaining Graph Neural Networks via Non-parametric Subgraph Matching
Fang Wu, Siyuan Li, Xurui Jin, Yinghui Jiang, Dragomir Radev, Zhangming Niu, Stan Z. Li
Abstract
The success of graph neural networks (GNNs) provokes the question about explainability: ``Which fraction of the input graph is the most determinant of the prediction?'' Particularly, parametric explainers prevail in existing approaches because of their more robust capability to decipher the black-box (i.e., target GNNs). In this paper, based on the observation that graphs typically share some common motif patterns, we propose a novel non-parametric subgraph matching framework, dubbed MatchExplainer, to explore explanatory subgraphs. It couples the target graph with other counterpart instances and identifies the most crucial joint substructure by minimizing the node corresponding-based distance. Moreover, we note that present graph sampling or node-dropping methods usually suffer from the false positive sampling problem. To alleviate this issue, we designed a new augmentation paradigm named MatchDrop. It takes advantage of MatchExplainer to fix the most informative portion of the graph and merely operates graph augmentations on the rest less informative part. Extensive experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets show the effectiveness of our MatchExplainer by outperforming all state-of-the-art parametric baselines with significant margins. Results also demonstrate that MatchDrop is a general scheme to be equipped with GNNs for enhanced performance. The code is available at: https://github.com/smiles724/MatchExplainer.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 77064419-477a-40a1-b31f-e15d5d2c0a15Cited by top-tier papers4
- Large Language Models are Good Relational LearnersFang Wu, Vijay Prakash Dwivedi, Jure LeskovecACL 2025 · 10 citations
- A probability contrastive learning framework for 3D molecular representation learningJiayu Qin, Jian Chen, Rohan Sharma, Jingchen Sun et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 5 citations
- Learnable Kernel Density Estimation for Graphs and Its Application to Graph-Level Anomaly DetectionXudong Wang, Ziheng Sun, Chris Ding, Jicong FanICML 2026
- TopInG: Topologically Interpretable Graph Learning via Persistent Rationale FiltrationCheng Xin, Fan Xu, Xin Ding, Jie Gao et al.ICML 2025
Builds on9
- Parameterized Explainer for Graph Neural NetworkDongsheng Luo, Wei Cheng, Dongkuan Xu, Wenchao Yu et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 888 citations
- GCC: Graph Contrastive Coding for Graph Neural Network Pre-TrainingJiezhong Qiu, Qibin Chen, Yuxiao Dong, Jing Zhang et al.KDD 2020 · 755 citations
- Graph Random Neural Networks for Semi-Supervised Learning on GraphsWenzheng Feng, Jie Zhang, Yuxiao Dong, Yu Han et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 526 citations
- On Explainability of Graph Neural Networks via Subgraph ExplorationsHao Yuan, Haiyang Yu, Jie Wang, Kang Li et al.ICML 2021 · 498 citations
- Data Augmentation for Graph Neural NetworksTong Zhao, Yozen Liu, Leonardo Neves, Oliver J. Woodford et al.AAAI 2021 · 487 citations
Related papers
- Generating In-Distribution Proxy Graphs for Explaining Graph Neural NetworksZhuomin Chen, Jiaxing Zhang, Jingchao Ni, Xiaoting Li et al.ICML 2024 · 7 citations
- Graph Segmentation and Contrastive Enhanced Explainer for Graph Neural NetworksZhiqiang Wang, Jiayu Guo, Jianqing Liang, Jiye Liang et al.AAAI 2025 · 4 citations
- DAG Matters! GFlowNets Enhanced Explainer for Graph Neural NetworksWenqian Li, Yinchuan Li, Zhigang Li, Jianye Hao et al.ICLR 2023 · 4 citations
- Multi-scale Explainer for Graph Neural NetworksLutong Wu, Shiying Cheng, Zhiqiang Wang, Jianqing Liang et al.ICML 2026
- Reinforcement Learning Enhanced Explainer for Graph Neural NetworksCaihua Shan, Yifei Shen, Yao Zhang, Xiang Li et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 81 citations
