LEASH: Adaptive Length Penalty and Reward Shaping for Efficient Large Reasoning Model
Yanhao Li, Lu Ma, Jiaran Zhang, Lexiang Tang, Wentao Zhang, Guibo Luo
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) often produce unnecessarily lengthy reasoning traces, which significantly increase computational cost and latency. Existing approaches typically rely on fixed length penalties, but such penalties are hard to tune and fail to adapt to the evolving reasoning abilities of LLMs, leading to suboptimal trade-offs between accuracy and conciseness. To address this challenge, we propose LEASH (adaptive LEngth penAlty and reward SHaping), a reinforcement learning framework for efficient reasoning in LLMs. We formulate length control as a constrained optimization problem and employ a Lagrangian primal-dual method to dynamically adjust the penalty coefficient. When generations exceed the target length, the penalty is intensified; when they are shorter, it is relaxed. This adaptive mechanism guides models toward producing concise reasoning without sacrificing task performance. Experiments on Deepseek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B and Qwen3-4B-Thinking-2507 show that LEASH reduces the average reasoning length by 60% across diverse tasks-including indistribution mathematical reasoning and outof-distribution domains such as coding and instruction following-while maintaining competitive performance. Our work thus presents a practical and effective paradigm for developing controllable and efficient LLMs that balance reasoning capabilities with computational budgets.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 76ffaf69-cd5e-4db8-a2dc-d6f7674786feBuilds on6
- Learning to Reason under Off-Policy GuidanceJianhao Yan, Yafu Li, Zican Hu, Zhi Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 310 citations
- Training Language Models to Reason EfficientlyDaman Arora, Andrea ZanetteNeurIPS 2025 · 270 citations
- Dynamic Early Exit in Reasoning ModelsChenxu Yang, Qingyi Si, Yongjie Duan, Zheliang Zhu et al.ICLR 2026 · 250 citations
- Learn to Reason Efficiently with Adaptive Length-based Reward ShapingWei Liu, Ruochen Zhou, Yiyun Deng, Yuzhen Huang et al.ICLR 2026 · 88 citations
- Sample More to Think Less: Group Filtered Policy Optimization for Concise ReasoningVaishnavi Shrivastava, Ahmed Hassan Awadallah, Vidhisha Balachandran, Shivam Garg et al.ICLR 2026 · 85 citations
Related papers
- Stop Unnecessary Reflection: Training LRMs for Efficient Reasoning with Adaptive Reflection and Length Coordinated PenaltyZewei Yu, Lirong Gao, Yuke Zhu, Bo Zheng et al.ICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- HAPO: Training Language Models to Reason Concisely via History-Aware Policy OptimizationChengyu Huang, Zhengxin Zhang, Claire CardieAAAI 2026 · 14 citations
- Learning When to Think: Shaping Adaptive Reasoning in R1-Style Models via Multi-Stage RLSongjun Tu, Jiahao Lin, Qichao Zhang, Xiangyu Tian et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 69 citations
- How Far Are We from Optimal Reasoning Efficiency?Jiaxuan Gao, Shu Yan, Qixin Tan, Lu Yang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 12 citations
- Your Models Have Thought Enough: Training Large Reasoning Models to Stop OverthinkingJinyi Han, Ying Huang, Ying Liao, Haiquan Zhao et al.ICLR 2026 · 11 citations
