Mirostat: a Neural Text decoding Algorithm that directly controls perplexity
Sourya Basu, Govardana Sachitanandam Ramachandran, Nitish Shirish Keskar, Lav R. Varshney
Abstract
Neural text decoding is important for generating high-quality texts using language models. To generate high-quality text, popular decoding algorithms like top-k, top-p (nucleus), and temperature-based sampling truncate or distort the unreliable low probability tail of the language model. Though these methods generate high-quality text after parameter tuning, they are ad hoc. Not much is known about the control they provide over the statistics of the output, which is important since recent reports show text quality is highest for a specific range of likelihoods. Here, first we provide a theoretical analysis of perplexity in top-k, top-p, and temperature sampling, finding that cross-entropy behaves approximately linearly as a function of p in top-p sampling whereas it is a nonlinear function of k in top-k sampling, under Zipfian statistics. We use this analysis to design a feedback-based adaptive top-k text decoding algorithm called mirostat that generates text (of any length) with a predetermined value of perplexity, and thereby high-quality text without any tuning. Experiments show that for low values of k and p in top-k and top-p sampling, perplexity drops significantly with generated text length, which is also correlated with excessive repetitions in the text (the boredom trap). On the other hand, for large values of k and p, we find that perplexity increases with generated text length, which is correlated with incoherence in the text (confusion trap). Mirostat avoids both traps: experiments show that cross-entropy has a near-linear relation with repetition in generated text. This relation is almost independent of the sampling method but slightly dependent on the model used. Hence, for a given language model, control over perplexity also gives control over repetitions. Experiments with human raters for fluency, coherence, and quality further verify our findings.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 76ff1196-2510-4575-85bb-8f72dc2a2b9eCited by top-tier papers27
- Medusa: Simple LLM Inference Acceleration Framework with Multiple Decoding HeadsTianle Cai, Yuhong Li, Zhengyang Geng, Hongwu Peng et al.ICML 2024 · 669 citations
- A Contrastive Framework for Neural Text GenerationYixuan Su, Tian Lan, Yan Wang, Dani Yogatama et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 349 citations
- Scalable Best-of-N Selection for Large Language Models via Self-CertaintyZhewei Kang, Xuandong Zhao, Dawn SongNeurIPS 2025 · 211 citations
- Learning to Break the Loop: Analyzing and Mitigating Repetitions for Neural Text GenerationJin Xu, Xiaojiang Liu, Jianhao Yan, Deng Cai et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 135 citations
- Do Language Models Plagiarize?Jooyoung Lee, Thai Le, Jinghui Chen, Dongwon LeeWWW 2023 · 109 citations
Builds on5
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
- Plug and Play Language Models: A Simple Approach to Controlled Text GenerationSumanth Dathathri, Andrea Madotto, Janice Lan, Jane Hung et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,166 citations
- Neural Text Generation With Unlikelihood TrainingSean Welleck, Ilia Kulikov, Stephen Roller, Emily Dinan et al.ICLR 2020 · 683 citations
- Automatic Detection of Generated Text is Easiest when Humans are FooledDaphne Ippolito, Daniel Duckworth, Chris Callison-Burch, Douglas EckACL 2020 · 21 citations
Related papers
- Turning Up the Heat: Min-p Sampling for Creative and Coherent LLM OutputsNguyen Nhat Minh, Andrew Baker, Clement Neo, Allen G. Roush et al.ICLR 2025
- Min-k Sampling: Decoupling Truncation from Temperature Scaling via Relative Logit DynamicsYuanhao Ding, Meimingwei Li, Esteban Garces Arias, Matthias Aßenmacher et al.ACL 2026 · 4 citations
- On the Efficacy of Sampling AdaptersClara Meister, Tiago Pimentel, Luca Malagutti, Ethan Wilcox et al.ACL 2023 · 3 citations
- Closing the Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationMatthew Finlayson, John Hewitt, Alexander Koller, Swabha Swayamdipta et al.ICLR 2024 · 31 citations
- Decoding Game: On Minimax Optimality of Heuristic Text Generation StrategiesSijin Chen, Omar Hagrass, Jason Matthew KlusowskiICLR 2025
