Bohdi: Heterogeneous LLM Fusion with Automatic Data Exploration
Junqi Gao, Zhichang Guo, Dazhi Zhang, Dong Li, Runze Liu, Pengfei Li, Kai Tian, Biqing Qi
Abstract
Heterogeneous Large Language Model (LLM) fusion integrates the strengths of multiple source LLMs with different architectures into a target LLM with low computational overhead. While promising, existing methods suffer from two major limitations: 1) reliance on real data from limited domain for knowledge fusion, preventing the target LLM from fully acquiring knowledge across diverse domains, and 2) fixed data allocation proportions across domains, failing to dynamically adjust according to the target LLM's varying capabilities across domains, leading to a capability imbalance. To overcome these limitations, we propose Bohdi, a synthetic-data-only heterogeneous LLM fusion framework. Through the organization of knowledge domains into a hierarchical tree structure, Bohdi enables automatic domain exploration and multi-domain data generation through multi-model collaboration, thereby comprehensively extracting knowledge from source LLMs. By formalizing domain expansion and data sampling proportion allocation on the knowledge tree as a Hierarchical Multi-Armed Bandit problem, Bohdi leverages the designed DynaBranches mechanism to adaptively adjust sampling proportions based on the target LLM's performance feedback across domains. Integrated with our proposed Introspection-Rebirth (IR) mechanism, DynaBranches dynamically tracks capability shifts during target LLM's updates via Sliding Window Binomial Likelihood Ratio Testing (SWBLRT), further enhancing its online adaptation capability. Comparative experimental results on a comprehensive suite of benchmarks demonstrate that Bohdi significantly outperforms existing baselines on multiple target LLMs, exhibits higher data efficiency, and virtually eliminates the imbalance in the target LLM's capabilities. Our code is available at https://github.com/gjq100/Bohdi.git.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on16
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- WizardLM: Empowering Large Pre-Trained Language Models to Follow Complex InstructionsCan Xu, Qingfeng Sun, Kai Zheng, Xiubo Geng et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,206 citations
- STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With ReasoningEric Zelikman, Yuhuai Wu, Jesse Mu, Noah D. GoodmanNeurIPS 2022 · 1,126 citations
- TIES-Merging: Resolving Interference When Merging ModelsPrateek Yadav, Derek Tam, Leshem Choshen, Colin A. Raffel et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 999 citations
- Language Models are Super Mario: Absorbing Abilities from Homologous Models as a Free LunchLe Yu, Bowen Yu, Haiyang Yu, Fei Huang et al.ICML 2024 · 605 citations
Related papers
- Speculate, then Collaborate: Fusing Knowledge of Language Models during DecodingZiyao Wang, Muneeza Azmat, Ang Li, Raya Horesh et al.ICML 2025
- HBO: Hierarchical Balancing Optimization for Fine-Tuning Large Language ModelsWeixuan Wang, Minghao Wu, Barry Haddow, Alexandra BirchICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- Knowledge Fusion of Large Language ModelsFanqi Wan, Xinting Huang, Deng Cai, Xiaojun Quan et al.ICLR 2024 · 113 citations
- Synergy over Discrepancy: A Partition-Based Approach to Multi-Domain LLM Fine-TuningHua Ye, Siyuan Chen, Haoliang Zhang, Weihao Luo et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Cool-Fusion: Fuse Large Language Models without TrainingCong Liu, Xiaojun Quan, Yan Pan, Weigang Wu et al.ACL 2025 · 12 citations
