Proof-Carrying Data from Arithmetized Random Oracles
Megan Chen, Alessandro Chiesa, Tom Gur, Jack O'Connor, Nicholas Spooner
Abstract
Proof-carrying data (PCD) is a powerful cryptographic primitive that allows mutually distrustful parties to perform distributed computation in an efficiently verifiable manner. Known constructions of PCD are obtained by recursively-composing SNARKs or related primitives. SNARKs with desirable properties such as transparent setup are constructed in the random oracle model. However, using such SNARKs to construct PCD requires heuristically instantiating the oracle and using it in a non-black-box way. [CCS22] constructed SNARKs in the low-degree random oracle model, circumventing this issue, but instantiating their model in the real world appears difficult.
In this paper, we introduce a new model: the arithmetized random oracle model (AROM). We provide a plausible standard-model (software-only) instantiation of the AROM, and we construct PCD in the AROM, given only a standard-model collision-resistant hash function. Furthermore, our PCD construction is for arbitrary-depth compliance predicates. We obtain our PCD construction by showing how to construct SNARKs in the AROM for computations that query the oracle, given an accumulation scheme for oracle queries in the AROM. We then construct such an accumulation scheme for the AROM.
We give an efficient "lazy sampling" algorithm (an emulator) for the ARO up to some error. Our emulator enables us to prove the security of cryptographic constructs in the AROM and that zkSNARKs in the ROM also satisfy zero-knowledge in the AROM. The algorithm is non-trivial, and relies on results in algebraic query complexity and the combinatorial nullstellensatz.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7648e298-d674-4164-aece-2f4b99569437Cited by top-tier papers3
- Perfect Zero-Knowledge PCPs for #PTom Gur, Jack O'Connor, Nicholas SpoonerSTOC 2024 · 2 citations
- A Zero-Knowledge PCP TheoremTom Gur, Jack O'Connor, Nicholas SpoonerSTOC 2025 · 1 citation
- Hobbit: Space-Efficient zkSNARK with Optimal Prover TimeChristodoulos Pappas, Dimitrios PapadopoulosUSENIX Security 2025
Builds on10
- Fractal: Post-quantum and Transparent Recursive Proofs from HolographyAlessandro Chiesa, Dev Ojha, Nicholas SpoonerEUROCRYPT 2020 · 162 citations
- Nova: Recursive Zero-Knowledge Arguments from Folding SchemesAbhiram Kothapalli, Srinath T. V. Setty, Ioanna TziallaCRYPTO 2022 · 123 citations
- PhotoProof: Cryptographic Image Authentication for Any Set of Permissible TransformationsAssa Naveh, Eran TromerS&P 2016 · 97 citations
- Halo Infinite: Proof-Carrying Data from Additive Polynomial CommitmentsDan Boneh, Justin Drake, Ben Fisch, Ariel GabizonCRYPTO 2021 · 62 citations
- Proof-Carrying Data Without Succinct ArgumentsBenedikt Bünz, Alessandro Chiesa, William Lin, Pratyush Mishra et al.CRYPTO 2021 · 58 citations
Related papers
- On Succinct Non-interactive Arguments in Relativized WorldsMegan Chen, Alessandro Chiesa, Nicholas SpoonerEUROCRYPT 2022 · 14 citations
- Arc: Accumulation for Reed-Solomon CodesBenedikt Bünz, Pratyush Mishra, Wilson Nguyen, William WangCRYPTO 2025 · 8 citations
- Constant-Size zk-SNARKs in ROM from Falsifiable AssumptionsHelger Lipmaa, Roberto Parisella, Janno SiimEUROCRYPT 2024 · 14 citations
- Aborting Random Oracles: How to Build Them, How to Use ThemGottfried Herold, Dmitry Khovratovich, Mikhail A. Kudinov, Stefano Tessaro et al.CRYPTO 2026
- Ligero: Lightweight Sublinear Arguments Without a Trusted SetupScott Ames, Carmit Hazay, Yuval Ishai, Muthuramakrishnan VenkitasubramaniamCCS 2017 · 338 citations
