Privacy in the Age of Neurotechnology: Investigating Public Attitudes towards Brain Data Collection and Use
Emiram Kablo, Patricia Arias Cabarcos
Abstract
Brain Computer Interfaces (BCIs) are expanding beyond the medical realm into entertainment, wellness, and marketing. However, as consumer neurotechnology becomes more popular, privacy concerns arise due to the sensitive nature of brainwave data and its potential commodification. Attacks on privacy have been demonstrated and AI advancements in brain-to-speech and brain-to-image decoding pose a new unique set of risks. In this space, we contribute with the first user study (n=287) to understand people's neuroprivacy expectations and awareness of neurotechnology implications. Our analysis shows that, while users are interested in the technology, privacy is a critical issue for acceptability. The results underscore the importance of consent and the need for implementing effective transparency about neurodata sharing. Our insights provide a ground to analyse the gap in current privacy protection mechanisms, adding to the debate on how to design privacy-respecting neurotechnology. CCS CONCEPTS • Security and privacy → Usability in security and privacy; Social aspects of security and privacy; Human and societal aspects of security and privacy.
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Lune answers from
the full paper · 3 top-tier papers that cite it · related work
Free to start. No credit card required.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- Prevalence Overshadows Concerns? Understanding Chinese Users' Privacy Awareness and Expectations Towards LLM-Based Healthcare ConsultationZhihuang Liu, Ling Hu, Tongqing Zhou, Yonghao Tang et al.S&P 2025
- What Users Ask, Policies Miss: Unveiling the Gap Between Community-Expressed Privacy Concerns and LLM Provider PoliciesZhihuang Liu, Zhen Huang, Ling Hu, Yifan Yang et al.USENIX Security 2026
- PrivaCI in VR: Exploring Perceptions and Acceptability of Data Sharing in Virtual Reality Through Contextual IntegrityEmiram Kablo, Melina Kleber, Patricia Arias CabarcosUSENIX Security 2025
Builds on2
- Evaluating the Contextual Integrity of Privacy Regulation: Parents' IoT Toy Privacy Norms Versus COPPANoah J. Apthorpe, Sarah Varghese, Nick FeamsterUSENIX Security 2019 · 69 citations
- High-resolution image reconstruction with latent diffusion models from human brain activityYu Takagi, Shinji NishimotoCVPR 2023
Related papers
- "I know even if you don't tell me": Understanding Users' Privacy Preferences Regarding AI-based Inferences of Sensitive Information for PersonalizationSumit Asthana, Jane Im, Zhe Chen, Nikola BanovicCHI 2024 · 33 citations
- Comprehension from Chaos: Towards Informed Consent for Private ComputationBailey Kacsmar, Vasisht Duddu, Kyle Tilbury, Blase Ur et al.CCS 2023 · 2 citations
- Tensions and Mitigations: Understanding Concerns and Values around Smartphone Data Collection for Public Health EmergenciesColin Watson, Ridita Ali, Jan David SmeddinckCSCW 2021 · 6 citations
- "I need a better description": An Investigation Into User Expectations For Differential PrivacyRachel Cummings, Gabriel Kaptchuk, Elissa M. RedmilesCCS 2021 · 45 citations
- Mind the Gap: Mapping Wearer-Bystander Privacy Tensions and Context-Adaptive Pathways for Camera GlassesXueyang Wang, Kewen Peng, Xin Yi, Hewu LiCHI 2026 · 2 citations
